Везде
PETROLEUM GENESIS AS A PROBLEM OF TRANSDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
PETROLEUM GENESIS AS A PROBLEM OF TRANSDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH
Annotation
PII
S1811-833X0000617-8-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Irina Gerasimova 
Edition
Volume 57 Issue 3
Pages
125-141
Abstract
The problem of petroleum genesis is fundamental for natural science. Scientific discussion on the problem of petroleum genesis originated with the science of Modern times and continue to this day. Physicists, chemists, biologists, geologists, geophysicists and cosmologists take part in the discussion. The problem attracts the attention of philosophers on science in many aspects. The author believes that it is necessary to conduct research of a transdisciplinary type that combines natural science and philosophical knowledge. Transdisciplinary research allows you to conceptually combine different scales of vision, different languages and standards of justification for specific Sciences. The prerequisites for a transdisciplinary approach on the part of natural scientists can be the synergetic setting of theoretical constructions. V.I. Vernadsky’s teaching about the biosphere and noosphere, which is included in the scientific picture of the world, can serves as a philosophical and conceptual basis. Transdisciplinary discussion on the petroleum genesis involve the analysis of philosophical, socio-psychological and concrete scientific aspects. The author carries out the logical and methodological analysis of the hypothesis of D.I. Mendeleev. The author comes to the conclusion that the philosophical type of argumentation prevails. The basis for a new dialogue the nature should be the subject- subject-object relationship. The principles of complexity philosophy can be used when discussing problems of geoecology and specific environmental research areas.
Keywords
philosophy of petroleum exploration, petroleum genesis, methodological consciousness, Lomonosov, Mendeleev, Vernadsky, interdisciplinarity, transdisciplinarity, complexity, uncertainty, hypothesis, experiment
Date of publication
01.09.2020
Number of purchasers
11
Views
404
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

    

  1. Baranets, N.G., Verevkin, A.B. Metodologicheskoe soznanie rossijskih uchenyh [Methodological Consciouness of Russian Scientists]. Part I. Ulyanovsk: Kachalin Alexander V. (Publ.), 2011. (In Russian)
    2. 

  2. Barenbaum, A.A. Nauchnaia revoliutsiia v probleme proiskhozhdeniia nefti i gaza. Novaia neftegazovaia paradigm [Scientific Revolution in the Problem of the Origin of Oil and Gas. New Oil and Gas Paradigm], Georesursy – Georesourses, 2014, vol. 4 (59), pp. 9‒15. (In Russian)
    3. 

  3. Bazhanov V., Scholz R.W. (ed.) Transdisciplinarnost’ v filosofii I nauke: podhody, problem, perspektivy [Transdisciplinarity in Philosophy and Science: Approaches, Problems, Prospects]. Moscow, “Navigator” Publishing House, 2015, 564 pp. (In Russian and English).
    4. 

  4. Botvinko, I.V., Popova, O.V., Stroeva, A.R., Shuvalov, S.A., Vinokurov, V.A. Uglevodorody i metilovye efiry zhirnykh kislot v biomasse bakterii do i posle fizikokhimicheskogo vozdeistviia [Hydrocarbons and Methyl Esters of Fatty Acids in the Bacterial Biomass Before and after Physical and Chemical Exposure], Mikrobiologiia – Microbiology, 2014, vol. 83, pp. 152‒159. (In Russian)
    5. 

  5. Brown B., de Laplante, K., Peacoc, K (eds.). Philosophy of Ecology. Handbook of the Philosophy of Science Book. North‐Holland: Elsivier, 2011, 444 pp.
    6. 

  6. Dmitriev, I.S. Dushi otchaiannoi protest (Zametki o D.I. Mendeleeve) [The Protest of a Desperate Soul. (Notes on D.I. Mendeleev)]. [http://philosophy.spbu.ru/ 1697/9129, accessed on 03.05.2020). (In Russian)
    7. 

  7. Dmitriev, I.S. “Nauchnoe otkrytie in status nascendi” [Scientific Discovery in status nascendi], in: Chelovek epokhi peremen. Ocherki o D.I. Mendeleeve i ego sovremennikakh [Man of the Age of Change. Essays on D.I. Mendeleev and His Contemporaries]. Saint Petersburg: Khimizdat, 2004, pp. 90‒207. (In Russian)
    8. 

  8. Dmitrievsky, A. N. “Poligenez nefti i gaza” [Polygenesis of Oil and Gas], Doklady Akademii nauk, 2008, vol. 419, no. 3, pp. 373‒377. (In Russian)
    9. 

  9. Drecher, Wo (ed.). Techno-Economic Paradigm: Essays in Honour of Carlota Perez. London: Anthem Press, The Other Canon Foundation, 2011, 442 pp.
    10. 

  10. Gerasimova, I.A. et.al. (ed.) Slozhnostnost’ i problema edinstva znani a. i͡ Vyp. 2 [Complexity and the Problem of Unity of Knowledge. Issue 2] Moscow: IF RAN, 2019, 252 pp. (In Russian)
    11. 

  11. Guinarāes, M.H., Pohl, C., Bing, O., Varanda, M. “Who Is Doing Inter- and Transdisciplinary Research, and Why? An Empirical Study of Motivation, Attitudes, Skills, and Behaviours”, Future, vol. 112, Sept 2019. [https: // doi.org/10.1016/j.futures 2019.102441, accessed on 18.05.2019]
    12. 

  12. Hoffman, S., Pohl, C., Herring, J.G. “Methods and Procedures of Transdisciplinarary Knowledge Integration: Empirical Lessons from Four Thematic Synthesis Processes”, Ecology and Society, 2017, vol. 22 (1), p. 27. [www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780444516732/philosophy-of-ecology?via=ihub=, accessed on 18.05.2019]
    13. 

  13. Ivlev, A.A. “Obrazovanie tolshch, bogatykh organicheskim veshchestvom v svete novoi modeli globalʹnogo tsikla uglevodoroda” [Formation of Layers Rich in Organic Matter in the Light of A New Model of the Global Hydrocarbon Cycle], Geologiia nefti i gaza – Oil and Gas Geology, 2019, no. 5, pp. 83‒90. (In Russian)
    14. 

  14. Kontorovich, A.Yu. “Osadochno-migratsionnaya teoriya naftidogeneza: sostoyanie na rubezhe XX i XXI vv., puti dal'neishego razvitiya” [Sedimentory-Migration Theory of Naftidogenesis: State-of-art at the Turn of the 20th and 21th Centuries, Ways of Further Development], Geologiya nefti i gaza – Oil and Gas Geology, 1998, vol. 10, pp. 8‒16. (In Russian)
    15. 

  15. Krayushkin, V.A., Kutcherov, V.G., Klochko, V.P., Gozhik, P.F. “Non-organic Geresis of Petroleum: From Geologocal Hypothesis to Physical Theory”, Geologichskii zhurnal – Geological Journal, 2005, vol. 2, pp. 33‒43. (In Russian)
    16. 

  16. Kutcherov, V.G., Gerasimova I.A. “Genezis nefti i prirodnogo gaza: konkurentsiya paradigm” [Petroleum Genesis: Competition of Paradigms], Voprosy filosofii, 2019, vol. 12, pp. 106‒117. (In Russian)
    17. 

  17. Lomonosov, M.V. Izbrannye trudy [Selected Works in 2 vols., vol. 1]. Moscow: Nauka, 1986. (In Russian)
    18. 

  18. Lurie, M.A. “Preobrazovanie glubinnykh abiogennykh fliuidov v neftianom veshchestve” [Transformation of Deep Abiogenic Fluids in Petroleum Substance], Geologiia nefti i gaza – Oil and Gas Geology, 2019, no. 5, pp. 83‒90. (In Russian)
    19. 

  19. Makarenya, A.A. et.al. (eds.) D.I. Mendeleev v vospominaniiakh sovremennikov [D.I. Mendeleev in the Memoirs of Contemporaries, 2nd ed.]. Moscow: Atomizdat, 1973, 272 pp. (In Russian)
    20. 

  20. Mendeleev, D.I. “Gipoteza o proiskhozhdenii nefti” [Hypothesis about the Origin of Oil], in: Mendeleev, D.I. Izbrannye trudy [Collected Works in 25 vols., vol. 10]. Moscow – Leningrad: AN SSR, 1949, pp. 14‒15. (In Russian)
    21. 

  21. Mendeleev, D.I. “Mirovozzrenie” [The Worldview], in: Sobr. Soch. [Collected Works in 2 vols., vol. 24]. Moscow – Leningrad: AN SSR, 1954, pp. 455‒ 461. (In Russian)
    22. 

  22. Montuori, A. “Complexity and Transdisciplinarity: Peflection on Theory and Practice”, World Futures, 2013, vol. 69 (4‒6), pp. 2000‒2013.
    23. 

  23. Nicolescu, B. From Modernity to Cosmodernity – Science, Culture, and Spirituality. New York: SUNY Press, 2014, 271 pp.
    24. 

  24. Santos, G.C. “Philosophy and Complexity”, Foundations of Science, 2013, vol. 18 (4), pp. 681‒686.
    25. 

  25. Scholz, R.W., Binder, C.R. Environmental Literacy in Science and Society: From Knowledge to Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011, 631 pp.
    26. 

  26. Simondon, G. L’individuation a la lumiere des notions de forme et d’information. Grenoble:. Jérôme Millon, 2013. (1 re édition 2005).
    27. 

  27. Stepin, V.S. Chelovek, deiatel’nost’, kul’tura [Man, Activity, Culture]. Saint Petersburg: SPbGU, 2018, 800 pp. (In Russian)
    28. 

  28. Svirskiy, Ya. “Otnoshenie v perspective individuacii” [Attitude in the Perspective of Individuation], Mir Psihologii, 2019, no. 1 (97), pp. 13‒25. (In Russian)
    29. 

  29. Vernadsky, V.I. Trudy po geokhimii [Works on Geochemistry]. Moscow: Nauka, 1994, 496 pp. (In Russian)
    30. 

  30. Vernadsky, V.I. Filosofskie mysli naturalista [Philosophical Thoughts of a Naturalist]. Moscow: Nauka, 1988, 520 pp. (In Russian)
    31. 

  31. Weaver, W. “Science and Complexity”, American Scientist, 1948, vol. 36, p. 536.
    32.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate