Везде
Экономика как культура: возвращение к “спору о методах”
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Экономика как культура: возвращение к “спору о методах”
Annotation
PII
S086904990000617-0-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Danila Raskov  Alexander Pogrebnyak
Edition
Issue 2
Pages
96-106
Abstract

Economics as part of the cultural activities of individual requires search for a new vision of its subject field. Economic theory can not be isolated from the moral, historical, social, and sometimes metaphysical contexts, as well as from neighboring disciplines such as sociology and philosophy. This article aims to show how it is possible and why it is necessary to interpret the economy as a culture. Heuristic potential of this approach is revealed by the example of recreating the “dispute onhow to” appeal to the ideas of the German historical school and institutionalism, and the attempt to comprehend the ontological foundations of modern capitalism.

Keywords
economy, culture, nature, institutions, the German Historical School, ontology, existence, limb, deficit
Date of publication
11.03.2013
Number of purchasers
1
Views
1033
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf Download JATS

References



Additional sources and materials

Aglietta M., Orlean A. Den'gi mezhdu nasiliem i doveriem. M., 2006.
 Afanas'ev A.A. Ehkonomicheskaya mysl' v Ispanii XVI v. – Salamankskaya shkola // Ehkonomika i matematicheskie metody. 2004. T. 40. № 4.
 Ben'yamin V. Kapitalizm kak religiya // Ben'yamin V. Uchenie o podobii. Mediaehsteticheskie proizvedeniya. M., 2012.
 Berger P. Kapitalisticheskaya revolyutsiya (50 tezisov o protsvetanii, ravenstve i svobode). M., 1994.
 Bodrijyar Zh. Soblazn. M., 2000.
 Brogan U. Soobschestvo tekh, kto na puti k smerti // Topos. 2007. № 3.
 Veblen T. Teoriya delovogo predpriyatiya. M., 2007.
 Derrida Zh. Drugoj mys. Otlozhennaya demokratiya // Metafizicheskie issledovaniya. Vyp. 11. SPb., 1999.
 Efimov V.M. Predmet i metod interpretativnoj institutsional'noj ehkonomiki // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2007a. № 8.
 Efimov V.M. Spor o metodakh i institutsional'naya ehkonomika // Ehkonomicheskij vestnik Rostovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2007b. T. 5. № 3.
 Zhizhek S. Razmyshleniya v krasnom svete: kommunisticheskij vzglyad na krizis i soputstvuyuschie predmety. M., 2011.
 Zhizhek S. Tupik transtsendental'nogo voobrazheniya, ili Martin Khajdegger chitaet Kanta // Topos. 2007. № 3.
 Zhizhek S. Ustrojstvo razryva. Parallaksnoe videnie. M., 2008.
 Iglton T. Ideya kul'tury. M., 2012.
 Kozlovski P. Printsipy ehticheskoj ehkonomii. SPb., 1999.
 Laval' K. Chelovek ehkonomicheskij. Ehsse o proiskhozhdenii neoliberalizma. M., 2010.
 Majrovski F. Fizika i “marzhinalistskaya revolyutsiya” // Terra economicus. 2012. T. 10. № 1.
 Menger K. Issledovaniya o metodakh sotsial'nykh nauk i politicheskoj ehkonomii v osobennosti // Menger K. Izbrannye raboty. M., 2005.
 Nort D. Ponimanie protsessa ehkonomicheskikh izmenenij. M., 2010.
 Polan'i K. Aristotel' otkryvaet ehkonomiku // Polan'i K. Izbrannye raboty. M., 2010.
 Raskov D.E. Ritorika novoj institutsional'noj ehkonomicheskoj teorii // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2010. № 5.
 Rumyantsev M.A. Sofiya i Antisofiya na grani mirov // Filosofiya khozyajstva. 2012. № 3.
 Sorvin K.V. Problema aksiomatiki ehkonomicheskoj nauki // Samosoznanie: moe i nashe. M.,1997.
 Khajdegger M. Bytie i vremya. M., 1997.
 Khajek F.A. Karl Menger (1840–1921) // Menger K. Izbrannye raboty. M., 2005.
 Shmoller G. K metodologii obschestvenno-politicheskikh i sotsial'nykh nauk // Terra economicus. 2011. T. 9. № 3.
 Shmoller G. Narodnoe khozyajstvo. Nauka o narodnom khozyajstve i ee metody. SPb., 1902.
 Shumpeter J. Istoriya ehkonomicheskogo analiza. V 3 t. T. 3. SPb., 2001.
 Ehliot T.S. Izbrannoe. T. I–II. Religiya, kul'tura, literatura. M., 2004.
 Dorfman J. Thorstein Veblen and His America. New York, 1966.
 Klamer A. A Pragmatic View on Values in Economics // Journal of Economic Methodology. June. 2003.
 Langholm O. The Legacy of Scholasticism in Economic Thought. Antecedents of Choice andPower. Cambridge, 1998.
 McCloskey D. Bourgeois Dignity: Why Economics Can’t Explain the Modern World. Chicago, 2010.
 Mirowski Ph. Machine Dreams. Economics Becomes a Cyborg Science. Cambridge, 2002.
 Mitchell W. Types of Economic Theory: from Mercantilism to Institutionalism. New York, 1969.
 Robertson J. The Case for the Enlightenment. Scotland and Naples 1680–1760. Cambridge, 2005.
 Rutherford M. The Institutionalist Movement in American Economics, 1918–1947. Science and Social Control. Cambridge, 2011.
 Screpanti E., Zamagni S. An Outline of the History of Economic Thought. Second Edition Revised and Expanded. Oxford, 2005.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate