Making 'Science as a Public Good' meaningful: response to Stehr, Turner, and Sassower
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Making 'Science as a Public Good' meaningful: response to Stehr, Turner, and Sassower
Annotation
PII
S1811-833X0000617-8-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Pages
70-73
Abstract
I respond to the challenging comments of Nico Stehr, Stephen Turner and Raphael Sassower to my own article on the sense in which science can be regarded as a‘public good’. I agree with Stehr that this conceptualization brings various hazards that are exacerbated with increasing democratization of the knowledge system. Here I elaborate on an astute remark he raises from Georg Simmel. Based on a historically well informed account, Turner takes a more‘demystified’ view of science as a public good, ultimately seeing it as corresponding to John Ziman’s idea of‘reliable knowledge’. For his part, Sassower pursues a more ‘transcendental’ approach about knowledge being in the ‘common good’, while admitting that it is an aspiration rather than a reality.
Keywords
science, public good, Simmel, common good, reliable knowledge
Date of publication
01.12.2020
Number of purchasers
11
Views
387
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Fuller, S. Science: The Art of Living. Durham UK: Acumen Press, 2010, v+170 pp. 
2. Goldman, A. Knowledge in a Social World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999, 242 pp.
3. Hirsch, F. The Social Limits to Growth. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1977, ix+208 pp.
4. Sassower, R. A Sanctuary of Their Own: Intellectual Refugees in the Academy. Lanham MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2000, 111 pp.
5. Simmel, G. Sociology: Inquiry into the Construction of Social Forms. Vol. 1 (Orig. 1908). Leiden NL: Brill, 2008, 700 pp.
6. Sombart, W. Economic Life in the Modern Age. Eds. N. Stehr and R. Grundmann. New Brunswick NJ: Transaction Press, 2001, 390 pp.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate