Везде
WITTGENSTEIN AND HUSSERL AS THE REFORMERS OF SOCIAL SCIENCE
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
WITTGENSTEIN AND HUSSERL AS THE REFORMERS OF SOCIAL SCIENCE
Annotation
PII
S1811-833X0000617-8-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Alexander Sanzhenakov 
Edition
Volume 57 Issue 3
Pages
40-43
Abstract
The article is devoted to the rule-following problem and its impact on the sociology of science as K.A. Rodin presents them in his article. It is known that L. Wittgenstein in “Philosophical Studies”, using the rule of arithmetic addition as an example, formulated the rule-following problem, which has acquired the ultimate form of skepticism thanks to S. Kripke. This problem was transferred to the sociology of science by D. Bloor, where it received the following sociological explanation: rule-amenably activity can be understood only by incorporating rules into social institutions. P. Winch rejected a skeptical interpretation of this problem, and as K.A. Rodin shows in the article, most adequately showed the consequences of Wittgenstein's ideas for sociology. In his answer, A.A. Sanzhenakov draws attention to two circumstances. Firstly, sociology was influenced not only by late but also early ideas of Wittgenstein. Secondly, the rule-following problem as an important factor in the sociological turn can also be found in the phenomenology of E. Husserl. The author concludes about the need for additional research, which will draw a line between the influence of Wittgenstein and Husserl on sociology.
Keywords
wittgenstein, husserl, rule-following problem, sociology of science, ethnomethodology, life-world
Date of publication
01.09.2020
Number of purchasers
11
Views
362
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

    

  1. Chernavin, G.I. Neponyatnost’ samo soboi razumeyushchegosya [Incomprehensibility of Self-Understanding]. Moscow; Saint Petersburg: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ, 2018, 244 pp. (In Russian)
    2. 

  2. Divisenko, K.S. “Kontseptsiya zhiznennogo mira v transtsendental’noi fenomenologii E. Gusserlya: gorizonty sotsiologicheskogo issledovaniya” [The Concept of the Lifeworld in the Transcendental Phenomenology of E. Husserl: Horizons of Sociological Research], Peterburgskaya Sotsiologiya Segodnya – Petersburg Sociology Today, 2010, vol. 1, pp. 179‒194. (In Russian)
    3. 

  3. Husserl, E. Idei k chistoi fenomenologii i fenomenologicheskoi filosofii. Kniga pervaya [Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. First Book]. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt, 2009, 489 pp. (In Russian)
    4. 

  4. Husserl, E. Krizis evropeiskikh nauk i transtsendental’naya fenomenologiya [The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Philosophy]. Saint Petersburg: Vladimir Dal’, 2004, 399 pp. (In Russian)
    5. 

  5. Ladov, V.A. “Vitgenshtein versus Gusserl’” [Wittgenstein versus Husserl], Tomsk State University Journal, 2004, no. 282, pp. 49‒55. (In Russian)
    6. 

  6. Rodin, K.A. “Problema sledovaniya pravilu i mesto Vitgenshteina v sotsiologicheskikh issledovaniyakh: vozvrashchenie k Piteru Uinchu” [The Rule-Following Problem and Wittgenstein’s Place in Sociological Research: a Return to Peter Winch], Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 2020, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 23–33. (In Russian)
    7. 

  7. Winch, P. Ideya sotsial'noi nauki [The Idea of a Social Science]. Moscow: Russkoe fenomenologicheskoe obshchestvo, 1996, 106 pp. (In Russian)
    8.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate