Везде
Evolution of experiment in the context of techngenic civilization
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Evolution of experiment in the context of techngenic civilization
Annotation
PII
S1811-833X0000617-8-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Sergey N. Konyaev 
Edition
Volume 57 Issue 4
Pages
123-127
Abstract
Philosophical and methodological approaches to the processes of experimental measurement are discussed in the context of the modern natural sciences trends. “The collective experimenter” category is considered as conceptual foundation of modern experimentation in the scientific researches’ directions oriented to the people surviving in the modern world. Deepening of ecological crisis and its overcoming are connected to the process of noosphere’s elements formation according to author. Howard Pattee’s approaches to the essence of the experiment are considered from the point of view of his ideas of dynamic and linguistic complementarity of levels of complex system. Pattee insists on the fact that artificial complex system do not exist except as abstraction that leaves out the brain in which their description originated. Howard Pattee have made the distinction between rate-dependent dynamical processes and rate-independent linguistic descriptions as essential component of complex systems. According to Pattee “a measuring device is a physical constraint that tacitly execute a rule that relate a system to an element of description of system. Any attempt to make the dynamics of this execution explicit or detail only obscures the measurements. that is the more you describe the measuring device, the less effectively it measures or describes system. A similar situation occurs when we generate speech. Either we can say what we mean, or we can analyze how we have said it, but trying to do both at the same time renders us incoherent. We cannot speak two languages at once, since the essence of any language is the unity, completeness and coherence of its syntactical rules”. Thus, Pattee’s approach could be used to explain how action with things produces number. It is also very important that a complex system must read and write its own messages. Therefore, no external observer is needed for self-describing of the complex system.
Keywords
philosophy of natural sciences, technogenic civilization, noosphere, experimentation, measurement, complex systems
Date of publication
01.12.2020
Number of purchasers
11
Views
386
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

    

  1. Arshinov, V.I. “Postneklassicheskaya ratsional’nost kak protsessual’noye slozhnostno-setevoye myshleniye” [Post-non-classical Rationality as a Procedural Complex-network Thinking], Pervye stepinskie chteniya. Sovremennyjetap razvitiya nauki I krizis texnogennoj civilizacii [First Stepin’s Proceedings. The Current Stage Of Development Of Science And The Crisis Of Technological Civilization]. Kursk: ZAO «Universitetskaya kniga», 2019, pp. 69‒72. (In Russian)
    2. 

  2. Galison, P. “Kollektivnyy avtor” [The Collective Author], Voprosy filosofii, 2018, no. 5, pp. 93‒113. (In Russian)
    3. 

  3. Krushanov, A.A. “Epistemologiya kollektivnogo sub’ekta kak samostoyatel’nyi domen filosofii nauki” [Epistemology of the Collective Agent as an Independent Domain of the Philosophy of Science], Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 2014, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 79‒95. (In Russian)
    4. 

  4. Larents, R. “Matematika: iz vesthei ili dlya vesthei?” [Mathematics: From Things or for Things], Mamchur, E.A. (ed.) Problema real’nosti v sovremennom estestvoznanii [The Problem of Reality in Contemporary Natural Sciences]. Moscow: Kanon +, 2015, pp. 291‒311. (In Russian)
    5. 

  5. Lipkin, A.I. Osnovaniya fiziki. Vzglyad iz teoreticheskoi fiziki [Foundations of Physics. A View from Theoretical Physics]. Moscow: LENAND, 2014, 208 pp.
    6. 

  6. Lisichkin, V.A., Shelepin, L.A., Boev, B.V. Zakat tsivilizatsii i dvizhenie k noosfere (ekologiya s raznykhstoron) [The Decline of Civilization, or the Movement towards the Noosphere (Ecology from the Different Angles)]. Moscow: ICz Garant, 1997, 345 pp. (In Russian)
    7. 

  7. Pattee, H. “Dinamicheskiye I lingvisticheskiye printsypy funkstionirovaniya slozhnyh system” [Dynamic and Linguistic Principles of the Complex Systems Functioning], in: Bazhenov, L.B. et al. (eds.) Kontseptsiya virtual’nykh mirovinauchnoye poznaniye [The Concept of the Virtual Worlds and Scientific Knowledge]. Saint Petersburg: RHGI, 2000, 320 pp. (In Russian)
    8. 

  8. Pronskikh, V.S. “Struktura I evolyuciya eksperimenta proto-megasajens kak zony obmena: social’no-istoricheskij aspect” [Structure and Evolution of Proto-Megascience. Experiment as a Trading Zone: Social-Historical Aspects], Filosofiya nauki, 2018, vol. 4, no. 79, pp. 68‒96. (In Russian)
    9. 

  9. Pruzhinin, B. I. “Kollektivnyi sub”ekt v nauchnoi traditsii (filosofsko-metodologicheskie zametki)” [“Collective Agent in Scientific Tradition (Philosophical and Methodological Notes)], Gumanitarnye issledovaniya v Vostochnoi Sibiri i na Dal’nem Vostoke, 2019, vol. 2, no. 48, pp. 105‒110. (In Russian)
    10.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate