- PII
- S086904990011602-4-1
- DOI
- 10.31857/S086904990011602-4
- Publication type
- Article
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume / Issue 5
- Pages
- 48-60
- Abstract
The article presents a comparative analysis of three main approaches underlying the complex of instruments used in different countries to support arts and culture. The approach viewing culture as a patronized good corresponds to paternalistic model of the support for culture, the model implies making compensation of the objectively defi ned revenue defi cit in the cultural institutions with the aid of budgetary allocations. Viewing culture as a factor of human capital development entails investment model to support cultural sector. The investment model means increasing government investment in the humanitarian fi eld to ensure the transition to the innovation and knowledge-based economy and to sustainable social and economic growth. The third model views culture as the core of creative economy and corresponds to the stimulating support model. The stimulating model implies creating conditions for the creative industries development and creative class attraction, providing international competitiveness of the nations and cities in the global economy. The system of the support measures is analyzed for each of these approaches, using Russian and international practice.
- Keywords
- funding for culture, patronized goods, human capital, government support, creative economy
- Date of publication
- 17.05.2015
- Year of publication
- 2015
- Number of purchasers
- 1
- Views
- 1279
References
- 1. Abankina I., Abankina T., Osoveckaya N. (2005) Finansirovanie kultury v evropejskih stranah: obzor podhodov i metodov [Financing of culture in European countries: a review of approaches and methods]. Otechestvennye zapiski, no. 4 (25), pp. 124131.
- 2. Abankina T., Kushtanina E., Romanova V., Rudnik B. (2014) Gosudarstvennaya podderzhka kultury [State Support for Culture]. Moskva: Izdatelskij dom GU VSHE.
- 3. Baumol W.J., Bowen W.G. (1966) Performing Arts: the Economic Dilemma. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund.
- 4. Becker G. (1964) Human Capital. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
- 5. Creative Economy Report (2010) (http://unctad.org/es/Docs/ditctab20103_en.pdf).
- 6. Denison E.F. (1962) The Sources of Economic Growth in the United States and the Alternatives before Us. New York: Easterlin, Richard.
- 7. Fisher S., Dornbush R., Shmalenzi R. (1995) Ekonomicheskaya teoriya [The economic theory]. M., Delo LTD (http://mexalib.com/view/13139).
- 8. Florida R. (2005) Kreativnyj klass: lyudi, kotorye menyayut budushchee [Creative class: people who change the future]. Moskva: Klassika XXI.
- 9. Greenberg R.S., Rubinstein A.Y. (2008) Osnovaniya smeshannoi ekonomiki [Foundations of Mixed Economy]. Moscow: IE RAS.
- 10. Greenberg R.S., Rubinstein A.Y. (2000) Ekonomicheskaya sotsiodinamika [Economic Sociodynamics]. Moscow: ISEPress.
- 11. Hokins J. (2011) Kreativnaya ehkonomika [Creative Economy]. Moskva: Klassika XXI.
- 12. Kapelyushnikov R.I. (2012) Skolko stoit chelovecheskij kapital Rossii? [How much is a human capital of Russia?]. Moskva: Izdatelskij dom GU VSHE.
- 13. Koncepciya dolgosrochnogo socialno-ehkonomicheskogo razvitiya Rossijskoj Federacii do 2020 goda [The concept of long-term socio-economic development of the Russian Federation until 2020]. Utverzhdena rasporyazheniem Pravitelstva Rossijskoj Federacii ot 17 noyabrya 2008 g. ¹ 1662-r (http://fi p.kpmo.ru/fi p/info/13429.html).
- 14. Kuznets S. Toward a Theory of Economic Growth, with Refl ections on the Economic Growth of Modern Nations. New York: Norton. Lewis, 1968.
- 15. Lehndri C. (2005) Kreativnyj gorod [The Creative City: a toolkit for urban innovators]. Moskva: Klassika XXI.
- 16. Mincer J. (1994) The Production of Human Capital and the Lifecycle of Earnings: Variations on a Theme. Working Paper of the NBER, no. 4838.
- 17. Musgrave R.A.(1996) Public Finance and Finanzwissenschaft Traditions Compared. Finanzarchiv, vol. 53, ðp. 145193.
- 18. Muzychuk V.Y. (2012) Dolzhno li gosudarstvo fi nansirovat kulturu? [Whether the State should finance culture?] Moskva: Institut ehkonomiki RAN (http://inecon.org/docs/Muzychuk_paper.pdf).
- 19. Rubinstein A.Y. (2008) Ekonomika obshchestvennykh preferentsii [Economics of Public Preferences], St.-Petersburg: Aletheya.
- 20. Rubinstein A.Y., Muzychuk V.Y. (2014) Optimizaciya ili degradaciya? Mezhdu proshlym i budushchim rossijskoj kultury [Optimization or degradation? Between the past and the future of Russian culture]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost, no. 6, pp. 522.
- 21. Shishkin S.V. (2003) Ekonomika socialnoj sfery. Uchebnoe posobie [The economy of the social sphere. Textbook]. Moskva: GU VSHE.
- 22. Shultz T. (1968) Human Capital in the International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. New York: Columbia Univ. Press (http://www.knigka.info/2009/05/30/international-encyclopedia-of-the.html).
- 23. Yakobson L.I. (1996) Ekonomika obshchestvennogo sektora. Osnovy teorii gosudarstvennyh finansov [Public Economics. Fundamentals of the theory of public fi nance]. Moskva: GU VSHE.
