Везде
Law and Justice: The Russian Social Development in Modern and Contemporary Times
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Law and Justice: The Russian Social Development in Modern and Contemporary Times
Annotation
PII
S086904990011559-6-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Andrei Medushevsky 
Occupation: Tenured professor
Affiliation: National Research University – “Higher School of Economics”
Address: 20, Myasnitskaya St., Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation
Edition
Issue 1
Pages
62-72
Abstract

The conflict between positive law and the idea of justice is the permanent driver for transitional social orders. The explanation of the Russian legal system as historical phenomenon is possible only in the context of evolving etymology of key notions of justice as moral value, legal phenomenon or historical tradition. On the basis of this approach the author reconstructs genuine characteristics of the Russian legal tradition, the stages of the transformation in process of modernization in the 18–19th centuries, the total destruction in the Soviet times and restoration in the Post-Soviet period. The current debate over law and legal consciousness reveals the importance of some elements of the national legal tradition but has not proved the conservative theory of path-dependence in Russian legal and political development. The author argues in favor of a new concept of justice which would be able to overcome the legal dualism, bridge the gap between positive law and conservative mental stereotypes in order to fulfill the necessary liberal social and political reform package.

Keywords
legal tradition, law, justice, fairness, modernization, legal dualism, constitutionalism, bureaucracy, reforms
Received
15.09.2020
Date of publication
17.02.2017
Number of purchasers
4
Views
1121
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf Download JATS

References

1. Bogdan M. (1994) Comparative Law. Kluwer Law International.

2. Butler W. Russian Law. (1999) London-Oxford: Oxford University Press.

3. David R., Zhoffre-Spinosi K. (1997) Osnovniye pravoviye sistemi sovremennosti [The main legal systems of the present] Moscow: Mezhdunarodniye otnosheniya.

4. Glendon M.A., Gordon M.W., Carrozza P.G. (1999) Comparative Legal Traditions. New-York: St Paul, West Group.

5. Glenn P.N. (2000) Legal Traditions of the World: Sustainable Diversity in Law. London-Oxford: Oxford University Press.

6. Gosudarstvennaya shkola russkoy istoriografii (2006) [State School of Russian Hisoriography]. Obshestvennaya misl’ Rossii 18-go nachala 20-go veka. Moscow: Rossijskaya politicheskaya misl’, pp. 117–119.

7. Konstitutsionniye printsipi i puti ikh realizatsii: rossijsky kontekst. Analiticheskiy doklad (2014) [Constitutional principles and ways to implement them: the Russian context. Analytical report]. Moscow: Institute for Law and Public Policy.

8. Konstitutsionnyiy monitoring: kontseptsiya, metodika i itogi ekspertnogo oprosa v Rossii v marte 2013 goda (2014) [Constitutional monitoring: concept, methodology and results of the expert survey in Russia in March 2013]. Moscow: Institute for Law and Public Policy.

9. Medushevskiy A.N. (2014a) Klyuchevyie problemyi rossiyskoy modernizatsii. [Key problems of Russian modernization]. Moscow: Direkt-Media.

10. Medushevskiy A.N. (2015) Politicheskie sochineniya: pravo i vlast v usloviyah sotsialnyh transformatsiy [Political writings: the right and the authority in terms of social transformation]. Moscow-St.Petersburg: Tsentr gumanitarnyih initsiativ.

11. Medushevskiy A.N. (2014b) Rossiyskaya pravovaya traditsiya – opora ili pregrada? [Russian legal tradition – a support or an obstacle?]. Mîscow: Fond “Liberalnaya missiya”.

12. Osnovyi konstitutsionnogo stroya Rossii: dvadtsat let razvitiya (2013) [Fundamentals of the constitutional system of Russia: twenty years of development]. Moscow: Institut prava i publichnoy politiki.

13. Tsvaygert K., Ketts H. (2000) Vvedenie v sravnitelnoe pravovedenie v sfere chastnogo prava [Introduction to comparative law in the field of private law], vol. 1–2. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnyie otnosheniya.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate