- PII
- S086904990011552-9-1
- DOI
- 10.31857/S086904990011552-9
- Publication type
- Article
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume / Issue 2
- Pages
- 132-141
- Abstract
Behavioral economic theory is based on the revealed through experiments deviations in the behavior of people from the one assumed by the neoclassical economic theory. These deviations are defined as cognitive biases. At present behavioral economics does not offer a way to model the behavior of economic agents taking into account cognitive biases. This work describes one of the possible approaches to modeling preferences that does not imply neoclassical assumptions about their characteristics. The main idea of this approach is to model preferences as a result of memory. Also the decision making process on the basis of conscious and unconscious information processing is analyzed in the context of the rationality assumption of the neoclassical theory.
- Keywords
- behavioral economics, experiment, cognitive biases, decision making process, preferences, rationality, memory, conscious, unconscious
- Date of publication
- 10.04.2017
- Year of publication
- 2017
- Number of purchasers
- 4
- Views
- 1179
References
- 1. Acker F. (2008) New Findings on Unconscious Versus Conscious Thought in Decision Making: Additional Empirical Data and Meta-Analysis. Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 3(4), pp. 292303.
- 2. Bettman G.R., Luce M.F., Payne G.W., Samper A. (2008) Boundary Conditions on Unconscious Thought in Complex Decision Making. Pshychological Science, vol. 19, pp. 11181123.
- 3. Brauner R., Usher M., Russo Z., Weyers M., Zakay D. (2011) The Impact of the Mode of Thought in Complex Decisions: Intuitive Decisions are Better. Frontiers in Psychology, no. 2, pp. 113.
- 4. Cherry E.C. (1953) Some Experiments on the Recognition of Speech, with One and with Two Ears. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, no. 25 (5), pp. 975979.
- 5. Coppin G., Delplanque S., Cayeux I., Porcherot C., Sander D. (2010) Im no Longer Torn after Choice: How Explicit Choices Can Implicitly Modulate Preferences for Odors. Psychological Science, no. 21, pp. 489493.
- 6. Deutsch J.A., Deutsch D. (1963) Attention: Some Theoretical Considerations. Psychological Review, no. 70, pp. 8090.
- 7. Dijksterhuis A. (2004) Think Different: The Merits of Unconscious Though in Preference Development and Decision Making. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, no. 87, pp. 586598.
- 8. Dijksterhuis A., Bos M.W., Nordgren L.F., van Baaren R.B. (2006) On Making the Right Choice: The Deliberation-Without-Attention Effect. Science, no. 311, pp. 10051007.
- 9. Dijksterhuis A., Meurs T. (2006) Where Creativity Resides: The Generative Power of Unconscious Thought. Consciousness and Cognition, no. 15, pp. 135146.
- 10. Goldstein R.M., Rey A., Perruchet P. (2009) Does Unconscious Thought Improve Complex Decision Making? Psychological Research, no. 73, pp. 372379.
- 11. Johnson E. J., Weber E.U. (2006) Constructing Preferences from Memory. The Construction of Preference. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press, pp. 397410.
- 12. Mas-Colell A., Whinston M., Green J. (1995) Microeconomic Theory. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
- 13. Miller G.A. (1956) Information Theory. Scientific American, no. 195, pp. 4246.
- 14. Payne J.W. (2005) It Is Whether You Win or Lose: The Importance of the Overall Probabilities of Winning or Losing in Risky Choice. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, no. 30, pp. 519.
- 15. Shastitko A.A. (2014) Povedencheskiy Antitrast [Behavioral antitrust]. Ekonomicheskaya politika, no. 6, pp. 7691.
- 16. Shastitko A.E. (2006) Modeli cheloveka v economicheskoy teorii [The models of a human in economic theory]. Moscow: Infra-M.
- 17. Stone J., Wright J. (2012) Misbehavioral Economics: the Case Against Behavioral Antitrust. Cardozo Law Review, vol. 33(4), pp. 15171553.
- 18. Thaler R. H. (1999) Mental Accounting Matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, no. 12, pp. 183206.
- 19. Treisman A.M. (1960) Contextual Cues in Selective Listening. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, no. 12 (4), pp. 242248.
- 20. Treisman A.M. (1964) Selective Attention in Man. British Medical Bulletin, no. 20 (1), pp. 1216.
- 21. Treisman A.M. (1969) Strategies and Models of Selective Attention. Psychological Review, no. 76 (3), pp. 282299.
- 22. Tversky A., Sattath S., Slovic P. (1988) Contingent Weighting in Judgment and choice. Psychological Review, no. 95, pp. 371384.
