RAS PresidiumОбщественные науки и современность Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost

  • ISSN (Print) 0869-0499
  • ISSN (Online) 2712-9101

Aggregators Around us: the new Reality and Approaches to Research

PII
S086904990011495-6-1
DOI
10.31857/S086904990011495-6
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Issue 4
Pages
5-15
Abstract

Due to the rapid development of digital economy and frequently emerged new players in the markets, information aggregators, there exists a need to determine what they are to limit the subject field of this concept. This work is an attempt to set a scope of information aggregators, highlight their functional relationship with intermediaries, platforms on two-sided (multi-sided) markets. The conducted research shows that the emergence of an aggregator on a two-sided market is possible when reducing average (per transaction) transaction costs, that reflects different ways to internalize positive indirect network externalities. Furthermore, the comparative advantages of aggregator emergence are closely connected with the type of goods exposed in the market.

Keywords
two-sided (multi-sided) markets, indirect network externalities, platforms, transaction costs, digital economy, standardization
Date of publication
17.08.2017
Year of publication
2017
Number of purchasers
4
Views
1271

References

  1. 1. Anderson S.P., Coate S. (2005). Market Provision of Broadcasting: A Welfare Analysis. The Review of Economic Studies, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 947–972.
  2. 2. Armstrong M. (2006). Competition in Two-Sided Markets. The RAND Journal of Economics, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 668–691.
  3. 3. Darby M.R., Karni E. (1973). Free Competition and the Optimal Amount of Fraud. The Journal of Law, Economics, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 67–88.
  4. 4. Demsetz H. (1968). The Cost of Transacting. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 33–53.
  5. 5. Evans D.S., Schmalensee R. (2008). Markets with Two-Sided Platforms. Issues in Competition Law and Policy (ABA Section of Antitrust Law), 1.
  6. 6. Evans D.S., Schmalensee R. (2013). The Antitrust Analysis of Multi-Sided Platform Businesses National Bureau of Economic Research. (No. w18783).
  7. 7. Hagiu A. (2006). Pricing and Commitment by Two-Sided Platforms. The RAND Journal of Economics, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 720–737.
  8. 8. Jullien B. (2012) Two-Sided B to B Platforms. The Oxford Handbook of the Digital Economy. Ed. by M. Peitz and J. Waldfogel.
  9. 9. Kumar R., Lifshits Y., Tomkins A. (2010). Evolution of Two-Sided Markets. Proceedings of the Third ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 311–320.
  10. 10. Lancaster K. (1979). Variety, Efficiency and Equity. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
  11. 11. Madnick S. (2002). Seizing The Opportunity: Exploiting Web Aggregation, MIS Quarterly Executive.
  12. 12. Nelson P. (1970). Information and Consumer Behavior. Journal of Political Economy, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 311–329.
  13. 13. Peitz M., Waelbroeck P. (2006). Why the Music Industry May Gain from Free Downloading – the Role of Sampling. International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol. 24. no. 5, pp. 907–913.
  14. 14. Rochet J.C., Tirole J. (2002). Cooperation Among Competitors: Some Economics of Payment Card Associations. Rand Journal of Economics, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 549–570.
  15. 15. Rochet J.C., Tirole J. (2005). Competition Policy in Two-Sided Markets. Advances in the Economics of Competition Law. Cambridge (MA), MIT Press.
  16. 16. Rochet J.C., Tirole J. (2004). Defining Two-Sided Markets. Mimeo, IDEI, Toulouse, France, January.
  17. 17. Rochet J.C., Tirole J. (2003). Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 990–1029.
  18. 18. Rochet, J.C., Tirole J. (2006). Two-Sided Markets: A Progress Report. The RAND Journal of Economics, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 645–667.
  19. 19. Ronnen U. (1991). Minimum Quality Standards, Fixed Costs and Competition. Rand Journal of Economics, vol. 22. pp. 490–504.
  20. 20. Rysman M. (2009). The Economics of Two-Sided Markets. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 125–143.
  21. 21. Shastitko A. (2004) Vybor mehanizmov upravlenija kontraktnymi otnoshenijami v uslovijah reformy regulirovanija jekonomiki [Selecting the contractual relationship management mechanisms in the context of economic regulation reform]. Moscow: TEIS.
  22. 22. Shastitko A. Ye., Parshina Ye.N. (2016a). Osobennosti zashchity konkurentsii na dvustoronnikh rynkakh [Competition policy specifics on the two-sided markets]. Zakon, no. 2, pp. 92–102.
  23. 23. Shastitko A. Ye., Parshina Ye.N., (2016b) Rynki s dvustoronnimi setevymi effektami: spetsifikatsiya predmetnoi? oblasti [Markets with bilateral network effects: domain specification]. Sovremenna konkurentsiya, no. 1, pp. 35–48.
  24. 24. Tambovtsev V.L (2001). Institucional’nyj rynok kak mehanizm institucional’nyh izmenenij. [The institutional market as a mechanism for institutional change]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’, no. 5, pp. 25–38.
  25. 25. Yablonskiy S.A., Muravskiy D.V., Smirnova M.M. (2013). Upravleniye brendami v mnogostoronnikh platformakh: rol’ sovmestnogo brendinga. [Brand management in multilateral platforms: the role of cobranding]. Marketing i marketingovyye issledovaniya, no. 5, pp. 356–364.
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library