RAS PresidiumОбщественные науки и современность Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost

  • ISSN (Print) 0869-0499
  • ISSN (Online) 2712-9101

Islamism and Modernization: discussion notes

PII
S086904990011492-3-1
DOI
10.31857/S086904990011492-3
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Issue 5
Pages
134-146
Abstract

This article is a reaction to the position expressed by Emil Pain (No. 5 2016) that raise of Islamism is the equivalent of demodernization. The main arguments against this position are the following ones. First, it’s not correct to identify Islamism with fundamentalism and jihadism. This movement is heterogeneous with various parts having different strategies. Second, the values of islamists are mixed: both modern and anti-modern with many similarities to the followers of protestant Reformation. Third, the way to modern society is objectively difficult and contradictive. It cannot be reduced to import of best practices from other countries. And it’s typical not only for the Islamic world. The understanding of the phenomenon of Islamism as complicated and ambiguous is necessary to elaborate efficient policy counteracting youth radicalization.

Keywords
modernization, Islamism, Islamic fundamentalism, jihadism, Islamic state, reformation, values
Date of publication
17.10.2017
Year of publication
2017
Number of purchasers
4
Views
1110

References

  1. 1. Armstrong K. (2013) Bitva za Boga: Istoriya fundamentalizma [The Battle for God: A History of Fundamentalism]. Moscow: Alpina non-fikshn.
  2. 2. Bayat A. (2013) Post-Islamism at Large. Post-Islamism. The Changing Faces of Political Islam.: Oxford Univ. Press, pð. 3–32.
  3. 3. Calhoun K. (2006) Teorii modrnizatsii i globalizatsii: kto i zatchem ikh pridumival [Theories of Modernization and Globalization: Who Invent them and What for?]. Lektsiya 17.01.2006 v ramkhakh proekta “Russkiye chteniya” (www.inop.ru/files/calhoun.doc).
  4. 4. Caputo J. (2011) Kak sekulyarniy mir stal postsekulyarnim [How Secular World Become Post-Secular]. Logos: philosopsko-literaturniy jurnal, no. 3, pð. 186–205.
  5. 5. Durkheim E. (1996) O razdelenii obschestvennogo truda [On the Division of Labor in Society]. Moscow: Kanon.
  6. 6. Eisenstadt S.N. (2003) Multiple Modernities. Id. Comparative civilizations and multiple modernities. Part II. Leiden, Boston: Brill, pð. 535–560.
  7. 7. Furman D.E. (2011) Ideologiya reformatsii i yeyo rol’ v stanovlenii burzhuaznovo obschestvennovo soznaniya [The Ideology of Reformation and its Role in Formation of Bourgeois Social Consciousness]. Furman D.E. Izbrannoye. Moscow: Izdatelskiy dom “Territoriya Buduschego”, pð. 41–109.
  8. 8. Habermas J. (2003) Filosofskiy diskurs o moderne [Philosophical Discourse on Modernity]. Moscow: Ves’ mir.
  9. 9. Inglehart R., Welzel Ch. (2011) Modernizatsiya, kulturniye izmeneniya i demokratiya: posledovatelnost’ chelovetcheskovo razvitiya [Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy. The Human Development Sequence]. Moscow: Novoye izdatelstvo.
  10. 10. Pain E.A. (2016) Islamism: sotsialno-politicheskaya sutchnost’ i noviye ugrozi dlya Rossii [Socio-political Nature of Islamism: New Threats for Russia]. Obschestvenniye nauki i sovremennost’, no. 5, pð. 115–127.
  11. 11. Park R.E. Fisika i obschestvo [Physics and Society]. Park R.E. Izbranniye ocherki. Moscow: RAN. INION, pð. 158–179.
  12. 12. Porozovskaya B.D. (1995) Jan Kalvin. Yego zhizn i reformatorskaya deyatelnost [Jean Calvin. His Life and Reform Activity]. Jan Gus. Martin Luter. Jan Kalvin. Torkvemada. Loyola. Biograficheskiye ocherki [Jan Hus. Martin Luther. Jean Kalvin. Torquemada. Loyola. Biographical Essays]. Moscow: Respublika, pð. 167–256.
  13. 13. Roy O. (2004) Globalized Islam: The Search for a New Ummah. New York, Columbia Univ. Press.
  14. 14. Walzer M. (1965) The Revolution of the Saints. A Study in the Origins of Radical Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
  15. 15. Weber M. (2011) Protestantskaya etika i dukh kapitalizma [The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism]. Moscow: Direkt-media.
  16. 16. Zizek S. (2010) O nasilii [On Violence]. Moscow: Evropa.
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library