THE PROPHECY OF THE THREE CORNELII
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
THE PROPHECY OF THE THREE CORNELII
Annotation
PII
S0321-03910000338-7-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Pages
28-35
Abstract

The paper deals with the prediction that three Cornelii were to rule Rome. The author argues that such a prophecy never existed and was a mere invention of P. Cornelius Lentulus Sura (who claimed to be the third Cornelius after Cinna and Sulla) intended to impress the Allobroges’ envoys and to persuade them to cooperate.

Keywords
Lentulus Sura, Allobroges, Sybilline books
Date of publication
08.01.2018
Number of purchasers
8
Views
468
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Arena, V. 2012: Libertas and the Practice of Politics in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge–New York.
Beerden, K. 2013: Worlds Full of Signs. Ancient Greek Divination in Context. Leiden.
Boissier, G. 1905: La conjuration de Catilina. Paris.
Brunt, P.A.1971: Social Conflicts in the Roman Republic. London.
Buchheit, V. Ciceros Kritik an Sulla in der Rede für Roscius aus Ameria. Historia 24, 570–591.
Büchner, K. 1962: Cicero. Wiesbaden.
Classen, J.C. 1965: Die Königszeit im Spiegel der Literatur der römischen Republik. Historia 14, 385–403.
Cornell, T.J. 1989: Rome and Latium to 390 B.C. In: Cambridge Ancient History. 2nd ed. Vol. VII. 2. Cambridge, 243–308.
Coulter, C. 1950: The transfiguration of the Sibyl. Classical Journal 46(3), 121–126.
Dunkle, J.R. 1967: The Greek tyrant and Roman political invective of the Late Republic. Transactions of the American Philological Association 98, 151–171.
Dyck, A.R. (ed.) 2008: Cicero. Catilinarians. Cambridge.
Erskine, A. 1991: Hellenistic monarchy and Roman political invective. Classical Quarterly 41, 106–120.
Goldsworthy, A. 2006: Caesar. Life of a Colossus. New Haven–London.
Hellegouarc’h, J. 1963: Le vocabulaire Latin des relations et des partis politiques sous la Republique. Paris.
Lenaghan, J.O. 1969: A Commentary on Cicero’s Oration De Haruspicum Responso. The Hague–Paris.
Mérimée, P. 1883: Études sur l’histoire romaine. Paris.
Münzer, F. 1900: Cornelius (240). In: RE. Hlbd 7, 1399–1402.
Orlin, E.M. 2002: Temples, Religion, and Politics in the Roman Republic. Leiden.
Pina Polo, F. 2006: El tirano debe morir: el tiranicidio preventivo en el pensamiento político romano. Actas y Comunicaciones del Instituto de Historia Antigua y Medieval 2, 1–24.
Radin, M. 1904: The conviction of Lentulus. Latin Leaflet. 100, 1–4.
Ramsey, J.T. (ed.) 2007: Sallust’s Bellum Catilinae. Oxford.
Rawson, E. 1975: Caesar’s heritage: hellenistic kings and their Roman equals. Journal of Roman Studies 65, 148–159.
G. Sallyustij Krisp, Zagovor Katiliny. S. P. Gvozdev (prim.), M.M. Pokrovskij (vvod. st. i obsch. red.). M.
Salomies, O. 2012: rev. on: Cicero: Catilinarians / Edited by Andrew R. Dyck. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge–New York, 2008. Arctos 46, 267–269.
Santangelo, F. 2013: Divination, Prediction and the End of the Roman Republic. Cambridge.
Shajd, Dzh. Religiya rimlyan. Per. s frants. O.P. Smirnovoj. M.
Shtaerman, E.M. Ot grazhdanina k poddannomu. V kn.: Kul'tura Drevnego Rima. T. 1. M., 22–105.
Sigmund, Ch. 2014: ‘Königtum’ in der politischen Kultur des spätrepublikanischen Rom. Berlin.
Wirszubski, Ch. 1950: Libertas as a Political Idea at Rome during the Late Republic and Early Principate. Cambridge.
Wissowa, G. 1912: Religion und Kultus der Römer. München.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate