Везде
METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO DECISION OF PSYCHOLOGICAL PROBLEMS OF MODERN TECHNIQUES DESIGN
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO DECISION OF PSYCHOLOGICAL PROBLEMS OF MODERN TECHNIQUES DESIGN
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000617-5-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
YURI GOLIKOV 
Abstract
There are considered the requirements to methodological ways of subject-object relations analysis given theoretical positions of man and techniques interaction and limitations of contemporary approaches to techniques automation and design. There were developed the general and partial methodological approaches to subject-objecct relations definition (subordinate, independent and equipotent relations) that reflected the specificity of systemic-structural objects organization and activity of subjects-professionals as well as determoned the directions of solving psychological problems in techniques design and exploitation. The necessity of statement of prognosis problem and studying potential characters of complex technical object and active strategy of its solving was founded.
Keywords
Тhe subject’s activity, subject–object relations, actual and potential properties, automatic system, man-machine complex, objective complexity, subjective complexity.
Date of publication
03.01.2004
Number of purchasers
0
Views
518
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials




    

  1. Akhutin V.M. Poehtapnoe modelirovanie i sintez adaptivnykh biotekhnicheskikh i ehrgaticheskikh sistem // Inzhenernaya psikhologiya: teoriya, metodologiya, prakticheskoe primenenie. M.: Nauka, 1977. S. 149-180.
    2. 

  2. Brushlinskij A.V. Deyatel'nost' sub'ekta i psikhicheskaya deyatel'nost' // Deyatel'nost': teorii, metodologiya, problemy. M.: Politizdat, 1990. S. 129-142.
    3. 

  3. Venda V.F. Sistemy gibridnogo intellekta: ehvolyutsiya, psikhologiya, informatika. M.: Mashinostroenie, 1990.
    4. 

  4. Galaktionov A.I. Osnovy inzhenerno-psikhologicheskogo proektirovaniya ASU TP. M.: Ehnergiya, 1978.
    5. 

  5. Golikov Yu.Ya. Sovremennye kontseptsii avtomatizatsii i podkhody k cheloveku i tekhnike // Psikhol. zhurn. 2002. № 1. S. 18-30.    
    6. 

  6. Golikov Yu.Ya. Teoreticheskie osnovaniya problem vzaimodejstviya cheloveka i tekhniki // Psikhol. zhurn. 2000. № 5. S. 5-15.      
    7. 

  7. Gubinskij A.I., Evgrafov V.G. Inzhenerno-psikhologicheskoe obespechenie proektirovaniya sistem upravleniya // Metodologiya inzhenernoj psikhologii, psikhologii truda i upravleniya. M.: Nauka, 1981. S. 115-121.
    8. 

  8. Zhuravlev G.E., Parsons S.O., Stroup L.T. Psikhologicheskie osnovy kul'tury bezopasnosti atomnoj ehnergetiki i promyshlennosti (sistemnye aspekty). M.: IP RAN, 1996.     
    9. 

  9. Zavalova N.D., Lomov B.F, Ponomarenko V.A. Printsip aktivnogo operatora i raspredelenie funktsij mezhdu chelovekom i avtomatom // Voprosy psikhologii. 1971. № 3. S. 3-15.               
    10. 

  10. Krylov A.A. Chelovek v avtomatizirovannykh sistemakh upravleniya. L.: LGU, 1972.
    11. 

  11. Kuz'min V.P. Sistemnost' kak stupen' nauchnogo poznaniya // Sistemnye issledovaniya. Ezhegodnik 1973. M.: Nauka, 1973. S. 76-107.
    12. 

  12. Lektorskij V.A. Sub'ekt, ob'ekt, poznanie. M.: Nauka, 1980.             
    13. 

  13. Munipov V.M., Zinchenko V.P. Ehrgonomika: chelovekoorientirovannoe proektirovanie tekhniki, programmnykh sredstv i sredy: Uchebnik. M.: Logos, 2001.
    14. 

  14. Parnyuk M.A., Garkovenko R.V., Bychko I V. Problema sub'ekta i ob'ekta v dialekticheskom materializme // Sub'ekt i ob'ekt kak filosofskaya problema. Kiev: Naukova dumka, 1979. S. 55-132.
    15. 

  15. Piskoppel' A.A., Vuchetich G.G., Sergienko S.K., Schedrovitskij L.P. Inzhenernaya psikhologiya: distsiplinarnaya organizatsiya i kontseptual'nyj stroj. M.: Kastal', 1994.
    16. 

  16. Stepin V S. Teoreticheskoe znanie. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2000.  
    17. 

  17. Sukhodol'skij G.V. Osnovy psikhologicheskoj teorii deyatel'nosti. L.: LGU, 1988.
    18. 

  18. Shvyrev V S. Analiz nauchnogo poznaniya: osnovnye napravleniya, formy, problemy. M.: Nauka, 1988.
    19. 

  19. Sheridan T.V. Dispetcherskoe upravlenie // Chelovecheskij faktor. M.: Mir, 1991. T. 3. S. 322-367.
    20. 

  20. Benders J, Haan J, Bennett D. Will symbiotic approaches become main stream // The Symbiosis of Work and Technology. London: Taylor and Francis, 1995. P. 135-148.
    21. 

  21. Billings C.E. Toward a human-centered aircraft automation philosophy // The Intern. J. of Aviation Psychology. 1991. V. 1. № 4. P. 261-270.
    22. 

  22. Brown O. The evolution and development of macroergonomics // Designing for Everyone // Proceedings of the Eleventh Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, Paris, 1991. V. 3. London: Taylor and Francis, 1991. P. 1175-1177.
    23. 

  23. Johannsen G, Levis A.H., Stassen H.G. Theoretical problems in man-machine systems and their experimental validation // Automatica. 1994. V. 30. № 2. P. 217231.
    24. 

  24. Kantowitz B.H., Sorkin R.D. Human factors: understanding people-system relationship. N.Y.: Wiley, 1983.
    25. 

  25. Meshkati N. Cultural context of the safety culture: a conceptual model and experimental study // Human-Auto-mation Interaction: Research and Practice / Ed. M.Mou-loua, J.M.Koonce. Mahwah, New Jersey: Erlbaum, 1997. P. 286-297.
    26. 

  26. Stanney K.M., Maxey J., Salvendy G. Social contexts in systems design // Human-Automation Interaction: Research and Practice / Ed. M.Mouloua, J.M.Koonce. Mahwah, New Jersey: Erlbaum, 1997. P. 305-312.
    27.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate