- PII
- S27129101S0869049925040101-1
- DOI
- 10.7868/S2712910125040101
- Publication type
- Article
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume / Issue number 4
- Pages
- 136-148
- Abstract
- Promotion of the national system of values provides for political and legal justification of non-recognition of arbitrary gender reassignment. Russian legislation establishes an uncontested ban on it, providing for a limited number of exemptions from the general rule. But even within the proposed regulatory model, a whole range of issues requiring regulatory resolution remains relevant, first of all, from the point of view of harmonization of private and public interests. On the one hand, the legislative decision limits the legal exercising of the constitutional right for health protection and taking advantage of medical care in the event of diagnosis of transsexualism as an independent mental disorder requiring medical correction, and may lead to actual exclusion from the socio-legal space of people suffering from such pathology. On the other hand, the emphasis should be made on raising the younger generation and countering promotion of gender diversity and unreasonable (beyond medical indications) gender reassignment, that can be viewed as breaching the right for privacy under the liberal agenda. In this regard, legislation in the field under study should take into account the principle of personal identity, which, from the legal point of view, means, firstly, a differentiated approach to those suffering from mental disorder and those broadcasting non-pathological manifestations of gender perception disorder, and, secondly, elaborating legislation aimed at combating destructive cultural impulses that undermine the state educational policy.
- Keywords
- смена пола социально-правовая идентичность медицинская коррекция аномалии полового развития брачно-семейные отношения приватность пропаганда нетрадиционных сексуальных отношений охрана здоровья транссексуализм
- Date of publication
- 11.07.2025
- Year of publication
- 2025
- Number of purchasers
- 0
- Views
- 100
References
- 1. Введенский Г.Е., Матевосян С.Н. (2017) Сексуальные расстройства в проекте МКБ-11: методологические и клинические проблемы // Социальная и клиническая психиатрия. Т. 27. № 3. С. 102–105.
- 2. Дробязко С.Р. (2023) Образ жизни личности как предмет конституционно-правовой защиты на примере вопроса о смене пола // Конституционное и муниципальное право. № 1. С. 53–57. https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-3767-2023-1-53-57
- 3. Кочарян Г.С. (2019) Транссексуальность: диагностические подходы и клиническое наблюдение // Здоровье мужчины. № 1(68). С. 80–85.
- 4. Малеина М.Н. (2002) Изменение биологического и социального пола: перспективы развития законодательства // Журнал российского права. № 9. С. 52–59.
- 5. Сафронов В.В., Старцева О.И., Адамян Р.Т., Ибрегимова М.Р. (2021) Распространенность транссексуализма в мире // Пластическая хирургия и эстетическая медицина. № 4. С. 69–76. https://doi.org/10.17116/plast.hirurgia202104169
- 6. Соловьева Н.В., Макарова Е.В., Вильянов В.Б., Кременицкая С.А., Чаусова С.В., Кичук И.В. (2019) Социально-демографический портрет транссексуальных пациентов в России // Медицинский совет. № 6. С. 148–153. https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2019-6-148-153
- 7. De Cuypere G., Winter S. (2016) A gender incongruence diagnosis: where to go? The Lancet. № 3. Pp. 796–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215–0366 (16)30212–7
- 8. Fisk N. (1974) Gender dysphoria syndrome – the conceptualization that liberalizes indications for total gender reorientation and implies a broadly based multi-dimensional rehabilitative regimen. West J Med. May;120 (5): 386–91.
- 9. Kaltiala R., Holttinen T., Tuisku K. (2023) Have the psychiatric needs of people seeking gender reassignment changed as their numbers increase? A register study in Finland. Eur Psychiatry. Nov; 6; 66 (1): e93. https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.2471
- 10. Mueller S., De Cuypere G., T’Sjoen G. (2017) Trans gender Research in the 21st Century: A Selective Critical Review From a Neurocognitive Perspective. Am J Psychiatry. Dec;1;174(12): Pp. 1155–1162. https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.2471
- 11. Cammu N. (2017) How Should We Name the Parents? The Challenges of Plus-Two-Parent Families for Legal Kinship Terminology. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family. Vol. 31. Issue 3. Pp. 328–343. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebx009
- 12. Schaefer L., Wheeler C. (1995) Harry Benjamin’s first ten cases (1938–1953): a clinical historical note. Arch Sex Behav. Feb;24(1). Pp. 73–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541990
