RAS PresidiumОбщественные науки и современность Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost

  • ISSN (Print) 0869-0499
  • ISSN (Online) 2712-9101

Digital Detox from Social Media Among Students

PII
S27129101S0869049925020095-1
DOI
10.7868/S2712910125020095
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Issue number 2
Pages
114-127
Abstract
The digital detox from social networks among student youth is studied. Based on 30 semi-structured interviews with students of humanities specialties aged 18-24 years, open and axial coding was conducted in accordance with the logic of “grounded theory”. The conditions conducive to digital detox, motives for direct digital detox from social networks, motives that hinder digital detox, consequences of digital detox from social networks for the informants’ lives, and their future plans regarding detox are determined. Among the conditions conducive to detox, a positive attitude towards digital technologies in the informants’ families, an active non-virtual life filled with hobbies are highlighted. Digital detox occurs during periods requiring maximum concentration, for example, during a university exam period, when out-of-town students return to their families; refusal of social networks is also possible due to a reassessment of life values and a desire for a more conscious life. The motives for digital detox include: digital burnout, digital consumption, online privacy, and nonconformism. The study showed that respondents do not completely delete their accounts from all social networks, since social networks provide convenient access to information and the ability to communicate with people with whom communication occurs only in the online space. The consequences of digital detox are associated with an improvement in various aspects of quality of life: relationships with the immediate environment, increased time for self-development and leisure, and normalization of the emotional state.
Keywords
цифровой детокс социальные сети студенческая молодежь мотивы «обоснованная теория» качественная методология
Date of publication
05.04.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
36

References

  1. 1. Бауман З. (2005) Индивидуализированное общество. М.: Логос. 390 с.
  2. 2. Bauman Z. (2005) Individualizirovannoe obshchestvo [Individualized society]. Moscow: Logos. 390 p. (In Russ.)
  3. 3. Гофман И. (2000) Представление себя другим в повседневной жизни. М.: КАНОН-пресс-Ц, Кучково поле. 304 с.
  4. 4. Gofman I. (2000) Predstavlenie sebya drugim v povsednevnoj zhizni [Introducing yourself to others in everyday life]. Moscow: KANON-press-C, Kuchkovo pole. 304 p. (In Russ.)
  5. 5. Грановеттер М. (2009) Сила слабых связей // Экономическая социология. № 4. С. 31-50.
  6. 6. Granovetter M. (2009) The strength of weak ties. Ekonomicheskaya sociologiya, no. 4, pp. 31-50. (In Russ.)
  7. 7. Ефимова Г.З., Семенов М.Ю. (2020) Цифровой детокс молодежи (на примере использования социальных сетей) // Вестник РУДН. Серия Социология. 2020. Т. 20. № 3. С. 572-581. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2020-20-3-572-581
  8. 8. Efimova G.Z., Semenov M.Yu. (2020) Digital Detox for Youth (Based on the Use of Social Networks). Vestnik RUDN. Seriya Sociologiya, no. 20 (3), pp. 572-581. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2020-20-3-572-581 (In Russ.)
  9. 9. Кастельс М. (2000) Информационная эпоха: экономика, общество и культура. М.: ГУ ВШЭ. 608 c.
  10. 10. Kastel’s M. (2000) Informacionnaya epoha: ekonomika, obshchestvo i kul’tura [The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture]. Moscow: GU VSHE. 608 p. (In Russ.)
  11. 11. Маклюэн М. (2001) Галактика Гутенберга: Сотворение человека печатной культуры. Киев: Ника-Центр. 432 c.
  12. 12. Maklyuen M. (2001) Galaktika Gutenberga: Sotvorenie cheloveka pechatnoj kul’tury [The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Print Culture Man]. Kiev: Nika-Centr. 432 p. (In Russ.)
  13. 13. Мельникова М.С., Яковлев И.П. (2014) Понятие «Социальная сеть» в социологических теориях и интернет-практиках // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Язык и литература. Т. 9. № 1. С. 254-257.
  14. 14. Mel’nikova M.S., Yakovlev I.P. (2014) The concept of “Social network” in sociological theories and Internet practices. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Yazyk i literature, no. 9 (1), pp. 254-257. (In Russ.)
  15. 15. Страусс А., Корбин Дж. (2001) Основы качественного исследования: обоснованная теория, процедуры и техники. М.: Эдиториал УРСС. 256 с.
  16. 16. Strauss A., Korbin Dzh. (2001) Osnovy kachestvennogo issledovaniya: obosnovannaya teoriya, procedury i tekhniki [Fundamentals of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory, Procedures, and Techniques]. Moscow: Editorial URSS. 256 p. (In Russ.)
  17. 17. Тоффлер Э. (1999) Третья волна. М.: Издательство ACT. 261 c.
  18. 18. Toffler E. (1999) Tret’ya volna [Third wave]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo ACT. 261 p. (In Russ.)
  19. 19. Baker K.R. White K.M. (2011) In their Own Words: Why Teenagers don’t Use Social Networking Sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, vol. 14, is. 6, pp. 395-398. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0016
  20. 20. Billedo C.J., Kerkhof P., Finkenauer C. (2015) The Use of Social Networking Sites for Relationship Maintenance in Long-Distance and Geographically Close Romantic Relationships // Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, vol. 18, is. 3, pp. 152-157. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0469
  21. 21. Dabbagh N., Kitsantas A. (2012) Personal Learning Environments, Social Media, and Self-Regulated Learning: A Natural Formula for Connecting Formal and Informal Learning. Internet and Higher Education, vol. 15, is. 1, pp. 3-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002
  22. 22. Felix L., Dean B. (2012) Our story, 2 decades in the making. Digital detox. https://www.digitaldetox.com/our-story (accessed July 09, 2024).
  23. 23. Mccown J.A., Fischer D., Page R., Homant M. (2001) Internet Relationships: People who Meet People. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, vol. 4, is. 5, pp. 593-596. https://doi.org/10.1089/109493101753235188
  24. 24. Miller D., Costa E., Haynes N. et al. (2016) How the World Changed Social Media. UCL Press. 263 p. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781910634493
  25. 25. Przybylski A.K. Murayama K., De Haan C.R., Gladwell V. (2013) Motivational, Emotional, and Behavioral Correlates of Facebook Use. Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 29, is. 3, pp. 1847-1855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.014
  26. 26. Radtke T., Apel T., Schenkel K. et al. (2022) Digital Detox: An Effective Solution in the Smartphone Era? A Systematic Literature Review. Mobile Media & Communication, vol. 10, is. 2, pp. 190-215. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579211028647
  27. 27. Schmuck D. (2020) Does Digital Detox Work? Exploring the Role of Digital Detox Applications for Problematic Smartphone Use and Well-Being of Young Adults Using Multigroup Analysis. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, vol. 23, is. 8, pp. 526-532. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2019.0578
  28. 28. Tufekci Z. (2008) Grooming, Gossip, Facebook and MySpace: What Can we Learn About these Sites from those Who Won’t Assimilate? Information, Communication & Society, vol. 11, is. 4, pp. 544-640. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180801999050
  29. 29. Ugur N.G., Koc T. (2015) Time for Digital Detox: Misuse of Mobile Technology and Phubbing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 195, pp. 1022-1031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.491
  30. 30. Wyatt S., Thomas G., Terranova T. (2002) They Came, They Surfed, They Went Back to the Beach: Conceptualizing Use and Non-use of the Internet. In: Virtual Society? Technology, Cyberbole, Reality. Ed. S. Woolgar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 23-40.
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library