RAS PresidiumОбщественные науки и современность Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost

  • ISSN (Print) 0869-0499
  • ISSN (Online) 2712-9101

Germany in the Formats for Resolving Conflicts in Asia and Africa

PII
S0869049925010056-1
DOI
10.31857/S0869049925010056
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Issue number 1
Pages
67-80
Abstract
The focus of the study is on the experience of Germany’s participation in negotiations on the settlement and prevention of armed conflicts in the Near and Middle East, in Africa north of the equator. Comparative analysis, provisions of theories of conflict resolution and securitization are used. The dynamics of the Bonn process on Afghanistan are traced, as well as the evolution of the approach of official Berlin to the use of the «European trio» in the negotiations on the Agreement on a comprehensive plan of action with Iran. The contribution of Germany to the work of the Friends of Syria Group and the Small Group on Syria is shown in conjunction with attempts to advance the interests of the moderate opposition. The launch and difficulties of the Berlin Conference on Libya are considered. The reasons of the failures of German diplomacy, first of all FRG`s attempts to combine the goal of resolution of conflicts with the tasks of “containing” system opponents.
Keywords
Германия урегулирование вооруженные конфликты дипломатия переговоры Афганистан Иран Сирия Ливия
Date of publication
19.09.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
29

References

  1. 1. Братерский М.В. (2024) Мир фрагментации на смену миру глобализации // Актуальные проблемы Европы. № 1. С. 18–41. https://doi.org/10.31249/ape/2024.01.02
  2. 2. Новикова О.Н. (2022) Четвертая афганская война Великобритании // Актуальные проблемы Европы. № 4. С. 213–233. https://doi.org/10.31249/ape/2022.04.09
  3. 3. Степанова Е.А. (2023) Перемирие как компонент войны, этап мирного процесса или формат «ни мира, ни войны» // Международные процессы. № 1. С. 45–74. https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2023.21.1.72.6
  4. 4. Энтина Е.Г. (2024) Сербская внешняя политика: вызовы и восприятие // Актуальные проблемы Европы. № 2. С. 185–201. https://doi.org/10.31249/ape/2024.02.10
  5. 5. Buzan B., Waever O., de Wilde J. (1998) Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers. 239 p.
  6. 6. Glatz R., Kaim M. (2020) Mandat verlängern – Abzug vorbereiten // SWP-Aktuell, no. 18, pp. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.18449/2020A18 (In Germ.)
  7. 7. Leemhuis R. (2018) Iran’s Destructive Regional Policy: an Underrated Problem. Federal Academy of Security Policy. Security Policy Working Paper, no. 27, pp. 1–5.
  8. 8. Plato A. (2015) The End of the Cold War? Bush, Kohl, Gorbachev and the Reunification of Germany. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 454 p.
  9. 9. Tabrizi A.B., Coville T., Jalilvand D.R. (2018) Better Together: Brexit, the E3, and the Future of Europe’s Approach towards Iran. Berlin: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. 7 p.
  10. 10. Tull M. (2023) VN-Krisenmanagement in Mali // SWP-Aktuell, no. 22, pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.18449/2023A22 (In Germ.)
QR
Translate

Indexing

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library