- PII
- S086904990011531-6-1
- DOI
- 10.31857/S086904990011531-6
- Publication type
- Article
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume / Issue 3
- Pages
- 157-167
- Abstract
B. Latour distinguishes between “sociology of social” and “sociology of associations”. Similarly, we can speak of “economic economy” (economic theory) and the economy of cities, regions, countries, sectors. Constructivism is intended to include a network of researchers in the relationships with other actors and actants, the reconstruction of this situation. In contrast to this neo-Kantian scheme in the traditional discourse of the behavior of the subject assumes relatively independent in relation to the object. The “culture man” model can significantly contradict the “economic man”. Culture suggests that individuals are included in a certain context, politics, religion, technology, landscape. However, the attempt to view culture as a purely exogenous-determining factor of economic behavior is doomed to failure. Culture – part of the knowing subject, and the researcher should revise the base of their own thinking to understand the impact of culture on others. Refusal of such review often leads to errors.
- Keywords
- constructivism, institutions, economic man, culture
- Date of publication
- 17.06.2017
- Year of publication
- 2017
- Number of purchasers
- 4
- Views
- 1106
References
- 1. Auzan A. A. (2006) Pereuchrezhdenie gosudarstva: obshhestvennyj dogovor. [Being re-state: the social contract]. Moscow: Evropa.
- 2. Jacobs J. (2006) Zakat Ameriki. Vperedi Srednevekove. [Dark Age Ahead]. Moscow: Evropa.
- 3. Gladwell M. (2010) Genii i autsajdery: Pochemu odnim vsjo, a drugim nichego? [Outliers. The Story of Success]. Moscow: Junajted Press.
- 4. The Global Competitiveness Report 20092010 (published by the World Economic Forum within the framework of the Global Competitiveness Network). World Economic Forum. Geneva. 2.
- 5. Gurevich A. (2014) Istoricheskij sintez i Shkola Annalov [Historical synthesis and School Annals]. Moscow; St.-Petersburg: Centr gumanitarnyh iniciativ; Universitetskaja kniga.
- 6. Hofstede G. (1991) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. London: McGraw-Hill.
- 7. Inglehart R., Welzel C. (2006) Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
- 8. Kuzminov Y., Radaev V., Yakovlev A.A., Yasin E.G. (2005) Instituty: Ot zaimstvovanija k vyrashchivaniju. Opyt rossijskikh reform i vozmozhnoe kultivirovanie institucionalnykh izmenenij [Institutions: From adoption to grow. Åxperience of Russian reforms and the possible cultivation of institutional changes]. Moscow: HSE (https://www.hse.ru/pubs/share/direct/document/70846461).
- 9. Latour B. (2014) Peresborka socialnogo: vvedenie v aktorno-setevuju teoriju [Reassembling The Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory]. Moscow: ID HSE.
- 10. Luman N. (2004) Obshhestvo kak socialnaja sistema [Society as a Social System]. Moscow: Logos.
- 11. McCloskey D. (2015) Ritorika ekonomicheskoj nauki [The Rhetoric of Economics]. Moscow, St.-Petersburg: Izd-vo Instituta Gajdara, Izdatelstvo Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija, Fakultet svobodnyh iskusstv i nauk SPbGU.
- 12. Ortega y Gasset J. (2016) Vosstanie mass [Rise of the Masses]. Moscow: AST.
- 13. Rodrik D. (2016) Ekonomika reshaet: sila i slabost mrachnoj nauki [Economics Rules. The Right and Wrongs of the Dismal Science]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo Instituta Gajdara.
- 14. Tambovtsev V.L. (2016) Mif o kulturnom kode v nauchnykh issledovanijakh. Nauchnyj doklad [The myth of the cultural code in scientific research. Scientific report]. Moscow: IE RAN.
- 15. Thurow L. (1999) Budushhee kapitalizma. Kak segodnjashnie jekonomicheskie sily formirujut zavtrashnij den [The Future of Capitalism. How Today?s Economic Forces Shape Tomorrow?s World]. Novosibirsk: Sibirskiy hronograf.
- 16. Vakhshtajn V. (2011) Sociologija povsednevnosti i teorija frejmov [Sociology of everyday life and the theory of frames]. St.-Petersburg: Izdatelstvo Evropejskogo universiteta v SPb.
- 17. Veblen T. (2006) Pochemu ekonomicheskaja nauka ne yavlyaetsya evoljucionnoy disciplinoy? [Why is Economics not an Evolutionary Sciences?]. Istoki: iz opyta izuchenija ekonomiki kak struktury i processa [Roots: From the Studying the Economy as a Structure and Process]. Moscow: ID HSE.
