Везде
Perception of Fairness and Economic Inequality in Comparative Cross-national Context
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Perception of Fairness and Economic Inequality in Comparative Cross-national Context
Annotation
PII
S086904990011483-3-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Anna Andreenkova 
ORCID: 0000-0002-6776-7703
Occupation: Vice director, National Coordinator
Affiliation:
Institute for comparative social research (CESSI)
European Social Survey (ESS) in Russia
Address: Bolshaya Dmitrovka, 20/5, Moscow, 107031
Edition
Issue 5
Pages
18-30
Abstract

The survey data on the perception of fairness in cross-national comparative context is rather limited. The major methodological and theoretical difficulties related to the study of this topic cross-nationally highlighted in the article are multidimensionality of the concept, time-dependence and context-dependence. Studying different aspects of fairness separately is one possible solution to overcome these difficulties. European Social Survey (ESS) introduced the module on economic fairness and welfare policies in the survey covering almost all European countries. This unique comparative data confirmed high similarity between European countries in public perception of key role of government in social provision regardless of the differences in welfare systems between countries. But the evaluation of the implementation of different redistribution strategies and government efforts to promote fairness, the satisfaction with the effectiveness of government institutions in fulfilling these functions are very different in European countries. The public demand for welfare state and policies is high and almost universally supported, but the consensus on the measures and strategies of achieving economic fairness is not reached in Russia as well as in most other European countries.

Keywords
comparative cross-national surveys, methodology of population surveys, fairness, economic inequality, welfare states, ESS
Received
13.09.2020
Date of publication
17.10.2017
Number of purchasers
4
Views
1047
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf Download JATS

References

1. Adams J. (1963) Stacy Toward an Understanding of Inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, vol. LXVII, pp. 422–436.

2. Allport G.W. (1954) The Historical Background of Modern Social Psychology. Handbook of social psychology. G. Lindzey G. (ed.) Cambridge (MA): Addison-Wesley, vol. 1, pp. 3–56.

3. Andreenkova A. V. (2014) Sravnitelnye mezhstranovye issledovaniya v sozialnych naukach: teoria, metodologia, praktika. [Comparative cross-national surveys in social sciences: theory, methology, practice] M.: Novy Khronograph.

4. Andreenkov V.G. (2009) Metodologisheskie problemy i reschenia v sovremennych mezhdunarodnych sravnitelnych issledovaniyach [Methodological problems and solutions in modern cross-national comparative surveys]. Rossia v Evrope: po materialam mezhdunarodnogo proekta “Evropeiskoe sozialnoe issledovanie” [Russia in Europe: in accordance with international project materials “European social research”]. Moscow: Academia, pp. 13–46.

5. Bewley T.F. (1999) Why Wages Don’t Fall During a Recession. Cambridge (MA): Harvard Univ. Press.

6. Blau P.M. (1986) Exchange and Power in Social Life. New Brunswick (NJ): Transaction Books.

7. Deutsch M. (1985) Distributive Justice: A Social-Psychological Perspective. New Heaven: Yale Univ. Press.

8. Greenberg J. (1990) Organizational Justice: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow. Journal of Management, no. 16, pp. 399–432.

9. Gryaznova O. S., Magun V. S. (2012) Zaprosy zhitelei evropeiskich stran na gosudarstvennuyu podderzhku i bazovye tsennosti [Demands of residents of European countries on government support and basic values]. SPERO, no. 17, fall-spring, 7–33.

10. Homans J.C. (1974) Social Behaviour and its Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Worlds.

11. Liebig S., Valet P., Schupp J. (2010) Perceived Income Justice Depends on the Economy. Weekly Report of the German Institute for Economic Research, no. 6, pp. 187–192.

12. Oorschot van W., Meuleman B., Reeskens T. (2012) Popular Perceptions of Welfare State Consequences, a Multilevel, Cross-National Analysis of 25 European Countries. Journal of European Social Policy, no. 22(2), pp. 181–197.

13. Rawls J. (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge (MA): Harvard Univ. Press.

14. Rimskiy V.L. (2006) Sozialnaya politika kak metod reshenia sozialnych problem [Social policy as the method to solve social problems]. Obschestvennie nauki i sovremennost’, no. 5, pp. 92–96.

15. Rimskiy V.L. (2013) Spravedlivost’ v sovremennoi Rossi: mechty i ispolzovanie v sozialnych praktikach [Fairness in modern Russia: dreams and usage in social practice]. Obschestvennie nauki i sovremennost’, no. 5, pp. 27–36.

16. Schmoelders G. (2006) The Psychology of Money and Public Finance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

17. Seidl C., Traub, S. (2001) Taxpayers’ Attitudes, Behavior, and Perception of Fairness. Pacific Economic Review, no. 6, pp. 255–267.

18. Walster E., Walster G.W., Bershcheid E. (1978) Equity: Theory and Research. Allyn and Bacon, Inc.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate