Везде
Matrix of Muscovy and Its Reincarnation: How Reality Refutes the Good Wishes
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Matrix of Muscovy and Its Reincarnation: How Reality Refutes the Good Wishes
Annotation
PII
S086904990011463-1-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Andrey Zaostrovtsev 
Occupation: Professor, Senior Researcher
Affiliation:
Department of Public Administration, National Research University “Higher School of Economics”
International Center for Social and Economic Research “Leontief Centre”, St. Petersburg
Address: 17 Promyshlennaya st., St. Petersburg, Russia. 198099
Edition
Issue 6
Pages
67-76
Abstract

The article examines the main characteristics of the institutional structure of Russia: its historical origin and modern features. The attention is drawn to two opposite approaches: Russia is moving in the general stream of modernization, or it is going along a special path opposing the institutions of rule of law. The clashes between Moscovia and the Great Duchy of Lithuania in the past were interpreted as a confrontation between two incompatible civilization: the Asian (state) mode of production and the lawbased society. Six main qualities of the presence institutional core (the matrix of Muscovy) are singled out along with the role of culture as an informal institution and its decisive influence on the development and the countries prospects.

Keywords
Matrix of Muscovia, institutional core, law-based culture, potestary culture, mental models, traditional society of the modern type, samovlastie (authoritarianism), power-property, service state, estate society, administrative rent
Received
12.09.2020
Date of publication
17.12.2017
Number of purchasers
4
Views
1346
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf Download JATS

References

1. Alesina A., Dzhuliano P. (2016) Kul'tura i instituty. Chast I. [Culture and institutions. Part I]. Voprosy ekonomiki, no. 10, pp. 82–111.

2. Barsukova S., Ledeneva A. (2014) Ot globalnoi korruptsionnoi paradigmy k izucheniyu neformalnykh praktik: razlichie v podkhodakh autsiderov i insiderov [From the global corruption paradigm to the study of informal practices: The difference in the approaches of outsiders and insiders]. Voprosy ekonomiki, no. 2, pp. 118–132.

3. Chetvernin V.A. (2014) Ponyatie prava: konkuriruishchie paradigm [Concepts of law: competing paradigms]. Kapitalizm i svoboda: sbornik statei [Capitalism and freedom: collection of articles]. St.-Petersburg: Nestor-istoriya, pp. 161–205.

4. Chetvernin V.A., Yakovlev A.V. (2009) Institutsionalnaya teoriya prav sobstvennosti [Institutional theory of property rights]. Moscow: NIU VShE.

5. Coyne C. J., Boettke P. J. (2006) The role of economist in economic development. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 47–68.

6. Doich F., Wuherpfenning Yu. (2012) Modernizatsiya i demokratiya: peresmatrivaya teorii i fakty [Modernization and democracy: revising theories and facts]. (http://gefter.ru/archive/6924).

7. Hedlund S. (2015) Nevidimye ruki, opyt Rossii i obshchestvennaya nauka. Sposoby ob’yasneniya sistemnogo provala [Invisible hands, Russian experience and social science. Approaches to understanding systemic failures]. Moscow: GU–HSE.

8. Hedlund S. (2006) Vladimir the Great, Grand Prince of Muscovy: Resurrecting the Russian Service State. Euro-Asia Studies, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 781–785.

9. Kantor V. (2007) Mezhdu proizvolom i svobodoi. K voprosu o russkoi mentalnosti [Between arbitrariness and freedom. To the question of the Russian mentality]. Moscow: ROSSPEN.

10. Kordonskii S.G. (2008) Soslovnaya struktura postsovetskoi Rossii [Estate structure of post-soviet Russia]. Moscow: Institut Fonda “Obshchestvennoe mnenie”.

11. Kuda vedet krizis kultury? Opyt mezhdistsiplinarnykh dialogov (2011) [Where does the crisis of culture lead? Experience of interdisciplinary dialogues]. I.M. Klyamkin (ed.). Moscow: Novoe izdatelstvo.

12. Lindsi B. (2006) Globalizatsiya: povtorenie proidennogo. Neopredelennoe budushchee global’nogo kapitalizma [Globalization: the repetition of the past. The uncertain future of global capitalism]. Moscow: Alpina Bizness Buks.

13. North D. (2010) Ponimanie protsessa ekonomicheskykh izmenenii [Understanding the process of economic changes]. Moscow: GU-HSE.

14. Nureev R.M., Latov Yu.V. (2016) Ekonomicheskaya istoriya Rossii (opyt institutsionalnogo analiza) [The economic history of Russia (the experience of institutional analysis)]. Moscow: KNORUS.

15. Obolonskii A.V. (2016) Etika publichnoi sphery i realii politicheskoi zhizni [Ethics of the public sphere and the realities of political life]. Moscow: Mysl’.

16. Pelipenko A. (2015) Proklyatie Russkoi matritsy [The curse of the Russian matrix] (http://apelipenko.ru/ Íàóêà/Ñòàòüè/ÑòàòüèîÐîññèè/ÏðîêëÿòüåÐóññêîéìàòðèöû.aspx).

17. Pelipenko A. (2013) Sudba Russkoi matritsy [The fate of the Russian matrix]. (https://rufabula.com/articles/2013/06/19/russian-matrix).

18. Shkaratan O.I. (2015) Rossiya kak evraziiskaya tsivilizatiya [Russia as a Eurasian civilization]. Rossiya kak tsivilizatiya: materially dlya razmyshleniya [Rusia as a civilization: materials for reflection]. Moscow: Redaktsiya jurnala “MirRosii”, pp. 12–65.

19. Tambovtsev V. (2015) Mif o “kul'turnom kode” v ekonomicheskikh issledovaniiakh [The Myth of the “Culture Code” in Economic Research]. Voprosy ekonomiki, no. 12, pp. 85–106.

20. Travin D. (2015) Krutye gorki XXI veka: postmodernizatsiya i problem Rossii [Steep slides of the XXI century: post-modernization and the problems of Russia]. St.-Petersburg: Izdatelstvo Evropeiskogo universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge.

21. Travin D., Marganiya O. (2004) Evropeiskaya modernizatsiya; V 2 kn. Kn. 1. [European Modernization: In 2 v. V.1]. Moscow: AST; St. Petersburg: Terra Fantastica.

22. Zaostrovtsev A.P. (2014) Duglas Nort o culture i istoricheskom razvitii [Douglas North on culture and historical development]. Almanakh Tsentra issledovanii ekonomichaeskoi kultury fakulteta svobodnykh nauk i isskusstv SPbGU. [Almanach of the Center for Economic Research of the Faculty of Liberal Sciences and Acts of St.-Petersburg State University]. Moscow–St.-Petersburg: Izdatelstvo Instituta Gaidara, pp. 195–217.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate