Парадоксы государства налогоплательщика
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Парадоксы государства налогоплательщика
Annotation
PII
S086904990000617-0-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Edition
Pages
18-29
Abstract
The author contrasts the state of “night watchman” of classical liberal capitalist period and modern democracy taxpayer state. Put to the test the hypothesis that the transition to the last fraught withsoaring costs of new – social – needs, leading to a loss of quality in the performance of the traditionalfunctions of the state to ensure the security and defense, in spite of all the advances in military-technical sphere. As a result deliberately ineffective strategy of defense is chosen.
Keywords
pure public goods, mixed public goods, the dynamics of military spending, universal suffrage, electoral demand for public goods
Date of publication
07.05.2013
Number of purchasers
1
Views
1023
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf Download JATS

References



Additional sources and materials

Институциональные ограничения современного экономического роста. М., 2011.
Ленин В.И. Оппортунизм и крах II Интернационала // Ленин В.И. Полн. собр. соч. Т. 27.
Либкнехт К. Милитаризм и антимилитаризм. М., 1960.
Маннергейм К.Г.Э. Мемуары. М., 1999.
Смит П.Ч. Закат владыки морей. М., 2003.
Солженицын А.И. Архипелаг ГУЛАГ. Ч. 3. М., 2006.
Фридман М., Фридман Р. Свобода выбирать. М., 2007.
Яновский К., Маслов Д. О некоторых свойствах наблюдаемого экономического роста в Китае // Экономическая политика. 2009. № 6.
Яновский К. Несколько примеров методологии, или экономистам не в чем каяться // Общественные науки и современность 2009. № 2.
Aidt T.S., Putta Jo., Loukoianova E. Democracy Comes to Europe: Franchise Extension and Fiscal
Outcomes 1830–1938 // European Economic Review. 2006. Vol. 50. № 2.
CBO Staff Memorandum “Mandatory Spending: Trends and Sources of Growth” July 1992 (http://www.cbo.gov/publication/18082).
Eloranta J. From the Great Illusion to the Great War: Military Spending Behaviour of the Great Powers, 1870–1913 // European Review of Economic History. 2007. №11.
Eloranta J. Warfare and Welfare? Understanding 19th and 20th Century Central Government Spending. Warwick Economic Research Paper #699, 2004 Department of Economics, The University of Warwick.
Funk P., Gathmann C. What Women Want: Suffrage, Gender Gaps in Voter Preferences and Government Expenditures. SITE – Stockholm School of Economics Stanford University (Draft). July 2006.
Kuznets S. Modern Economic Growth. New Haven, 1966.
Mitchell B.R. International Historical Statistics 1750–2005: Vol. 3. Set (International Historical Statistics Africa, Asia and Oceania. New York, 2007.
Socol Y., Syunyaev O., Yanovskiy K. Failure to Supply Pure Public Good “Defense” in a MultiPolar Nuclear World. Public Choice Society 2012 Annual meeting report (http://www.pubchoicesoc.org/papers_2012/ Yanovskiy_Socol_Syunyaev.pdf).
Spring B., Bendikova M. Israel and the Jron Dom System: a Lesson for the United States // http: www.hertage.org/research/reports/2011/09/israel-the-iron-dome-system-a-lesson-for-the-unitedstates.
Stoll J.D. Norway Police Chief Resigns after Breivik Report // Wall Street Journal for Europe August, 16 on-line version (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390444508504577593811979684898.html#articleTabs%3Darticle ; http://europe.wsj.com/home-page).
Tanzi V., Schuknecht L., Public Spending in the 20th Century: a Global Perspective 2000.
Voegeli W. Never Enough. New York, 2010.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate