Эффективность государственного управления: политологический и экономический подходы
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Эффективность государственного управления: политологический и экономический подходы
Annotation
PII
S086904990000617-0-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Edition
Pages
77-88
Abstract
The article considers the modern approaches to the understanding and measurement ofthe effectiveness of state power. The authors investigated the possibilities of the method of DataEnvelopment Analysis in measuring effi ciency. Are methods of the solution of urgent up-to-date research tasks. Proposed in article tools can become the basis for building a comprehensive model ofthe effi ciency of public organizations.
Keywords
systemic approach, effectiveness, good governance, Data Envelopment Analysis
Date of publication
15.01.2013
Number of purchasers
1
Views
972
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf Download JATS

References



Additional sources and materials

Akhremenko A.S. Otsenka ehffektivnosti gosudarstvennogo sektora: teoreticheskaya model' i metodika izmereniya // Trudy seminara “Matematicheskoe modelirovanie politicheskikh sistem i protsessov”. Vyp. I. M., 2011.
Akhremenko A.S., Yureskul E.A. Ispol'zovanie logisticheskoj modeli v otsenke ehffektivnosti regionov Rossii (na primere analiza dinamiki VRP v 2000–2009 gg.) // Trudy seminara “Matematicheskoe modelirovanie politicheskikh sistem i protsessov”. Vyp. I. M., 2011.
Samuehl'son P., Nordkhaus V. Mikroehkonomika. M.–SPb.–Kiev, 2008.
Afonso A., Aubyn M. Relative Effi ciency of Health Provision: a DEA Approach with Nondiscretionary Inputs, Working Papers 2006/33, Department of Economics, ISEG, Technical University of Lisbon.
Andrews M. Are One-Best-Way Models of Effective Government Suitable for Developing Countries? John F. Kennedy School of Government. Cambridge (Mass), 2008a.
Andrews M. Good Government Means Different Things in Different Countries // An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions. 2010. Vol. 23. № 1.
Andrews M. The Good Governance Agenda: Beyond Indicators without Theory. Oxford Development Studies. 2008b. Vol. 36. № 4.
Arndt C. The Politics of Governance Ratings // International Public Management Journal. 2008. Vol. 11. № 3.
Besançon M. Good Governance Rankings: the Art of Measurement. World Peace Foundation report #36. Cambridge (Mass.), 2003.
Boyle R. Measuring Public Sector Productivity: Lessons from International Experience. CPMR Discussion Paper № 35. 2006.
Coelli T. An Introduction to Effi ciency and Productivity Analysis. Springer, 2005.
Devarajan S., Johnson S. Two Comments on “Governance Indicators: Where Are We, Where Should We Be Going?” by Daniel Kaufmann and Aart Kraay. The World Bank Research Observer. 2008. Vol. 23. № 1.
Fare R., Grosskopf Sh., Roos P. Malmquist Productivity Indexes: a Survey of Theory and Practice. Springer, 1997.
Hood C., Dixon R., Beeston C. Rating the Rankings: Assessing International Rankings of Public Service Performance // International Public Management Journal. 2008. Vol. 11. № 3.
Kaufmann D., Kraay A., Mastruzzi M. The Worldwide Governance Indicators Methodology and Analytical Issues. The World Bank Development Research Group Macroeconomics and Growth Team. Policy Research Working Paper № 5430. 2010 (http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/pdf/WGI.pdf).
Kaufmann D., Kraay A., Zoido-Lobatón P. “Governance Matters”. World Bank Policy Research Department Working Paper № 2196. 1999 (http://www.worldbank.org/wbi/governance/pubs/govmatters.htm).
Simar L., Wilson P. Estimation and Inference in Two-stage, Semi-parametric Models of Production Processes // Journal of Econometrics. 2007. № 136.
Van de Walle S. What Services are Public? What Aspects of Performance are to be Ranked? The Case of “Services of General Interest” // International Public Management Journal. 2008. Vol.111. № 3.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate