Везде
THE CLAIM IN PROTECTION OF PUBLIC INTERESTS AS A METHOD OF FIGHT AGAINST CORRUPTION
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
THE CLAIM IN PROTECTION OF PUBLIC INTERESTS AS A METHOD OF FIGHT AGAINST CORRUPTION
Annotation
PII
S086904990000617-0-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Petr Filippov 
Edition
Issue 5
Pages
59-65
Abstract
The article discusses the problems of claims in favor of an indefi nite number of persons in modernRussia. The authors note the effectiveness of this legal mechanism to combat the abuse and corruption.At the same time they emphasize the presence of obstacles, which linked its use in Russia, de factoban on fi ling such lawsuits by individual citizens, the general weakness of legal regulation of thiscategory of claims. As a possible reference point for law reform the practice of Anglo-Saxon familyis considered.
Keywords
corruption, actions in defense of an indefinite number of persons, class action
Date of publication
15.09.2011
Number of purchasers
1
Views
882
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf Download JATS

References



Additional sources and materials

Abolonin G.A. Massovye iski. M., 2011.
 Eliseev N.G. Grazhdanskoe protsessual'noe pravo zarubezhnykh stran. Uchebnik. (2-e izd.,pererab. i dop.). M., 2006.
 Petrukhin I.L. Istoricheskij ocherk deyatel'nosti prokuratury // Otechestvennye zapiski. 2003. № 2.
 Cook Ltd. v. Niedert. Nos. 97-1666, 97-1667 and 97-1584. Argued October 30, 1997–April 24, 1998 (http://caselaw.fi ndlaw.com/us-7th-circuit/1286046.html).
 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 23. Class Actions // (http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/Rule23.htm).
 Eisenberg T., Miller G.P. Attorney Fees in Class Action Settlements: an Empirical Study // Journal of Empirical Legal Studies. 2004. № 1.
 Gidi A. Class Actions in Brazil – a Model for Civil Law Countries // American Journal of Comparative Law. 2003. Vol. 51.
 Merryman J.H. On the Convergence (and the Divergence) of the Civil Law and the Common Law // Stanford Journal of International Law. 1981. Vol. 17.
 Newberg H.B., Conte A. Newberg on Class Actions. New York, 1992.
 Silberman L. 7 Vicissitudes of the American Class Action // With a Comparative Eye, 1999. Vol. 7.
 Watson G.D. Class Actions: the Canadian Experience // Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law Articles. 2001.
 Yeazell S.C. From Medieval Group Litigation to the Modern Class Action. New Haven, 1987.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate