- PII
- S086904990000616-9-1
- DOI
- 10.7868/S0000616-9-1
- Publication type
- Article
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume / Issue 2
- Pages
- 130-144
- Abstract
- The article discusses three ways of knowledge underlying the natural sciences, social and intuitive knowledge. There were the characteristics of the methodological basis of each of them – the formal, dialectical and holistic logic. Author has disclosed and formalized paradoxes of G. Gurdjieff and A. Govinda inherent the intuitive way of cognition. In paper is given the defi nition of a supercomplex system and discussed the reasons of its unknowability by traditional methods. It is shown that the basic feature of social knowledge is its classifi cation as a public good. Author has justifi ed the thesis that the transition from social knowledge to the intuitive knowledge should be made via an intermediate methodology – subtractive negative knowledge. There are outlined the contours of a new approach to the knowledge of the social reality.
- Keywords
- intuition, system, cognition, complexity
- Date of publication
- 05.03.2015
- Year of publication
- 2015
- Number of purchasers
- 1
- Views
- 1123
RAS PresidiumОбщественные науки и современность Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost
- ISSN (Print) 0869-0499
- ISSN (Online) 2712-9101
THREE WAYS OF KNOWLEDGE
Индексирование
Scopus
Crossref
Higher Attestation Commission
At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation
Scientific Electronic Library