VALIDIZATION OF RUSSIAN VERSION OF GOLDBERG'S "BIG-FIVE FACTOR MARKERS" INVENTORY
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
VALIDIZATION OF RUSSIAN VERSION OF GOLDBERG'S "BIG-FIVE FACTOR MARKERS" INVENTORY
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000617-5-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Abstract
Validization of Russian version of "Big-Five Factor Markers" inventory has been conducted. Application of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis revealed good correspondence between inventory's factor structure and theoretically expected one. All five scales have high internal consistency. Revealed gender and age differences in the scores of inventory scales correspond to those described in literature for "Big-Five's" factors. Correlations with Eysenck's Personality Profiler scales correspond to theoretically predicted ones. All these enable to consider Russian version of "Big-Five factor markers" to be reliable, valid instrument which can be used for national researches and for cross-cultural analysis of "Big-Five" factors as well.
Keywords
Structural equations modeling, confirmatory factor analisys, "big-five"
Date of publication
03.09.2010
Number of purchasers
2
Views
747
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials


  1. Goldberg L.R., Shmelev A.G. Mezhkul'turnoe issledovanie leksiki lichnostnykh chert: "Bol'shaya pyaterka" faktorov v anglijskom i russkom yazykakh//Psikhol. zhurn. 1993. T. 14. № 4. S. 32-39.
  2. Knyazev G.G., Slobodskaya E.R. Pyatifaktornaya struktura lichnosti v protsesse razvitiya (po dannym roditelej i samootsenki)//Psikhol. zhurn. 2005. № 6. S. 69-77.
  3. Odintsova V.V., Shmelev A.G. Analiz situatsionnykh razlichij v testovykh normakh (na primere test-oprosnika "Bol'shaya pyaterka")//Voprosy psikhologii. 2006. № 6. C. 143-146.           
  4. Costa P.T. Jr., McCrae R.R. Four ways five factor are basic//Personality and Individual Differences. 1992. V. 13. P. 653-665.
  5. Costa P.T., McCrae R.R. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI): Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1992.
  6. Costa P.T.Jr., Terraciano A., McCrae R. R. Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings//Journ. of Personality and Social Psychology. 2001. V. 81. P. 322-331.           
  7. Dahlen E.R., White R. P. The Big Five factors, sensation seeking, and driving anger in the prediction of unsafe driving//Personality and Individual Differences. 2006. V. 41. P. 903-915.
  8. Digman J.M., Shmelyov A.G. The structure of temperament and personality in Russian children//Journ. of Personality and Social Psycology. 1996. V. 71. P. 341-351.
  9. Everitt B.S., Dunn G. Applied Multivariate Data Analysis. L.: Arnold, 2001.
  10. Eysenck H.J., Wilson G.D. Manual of the Eysenck Personality Profiler (v. 6). Guildford: Psi-Press, 2000.
  11. Floyd F.J., Widaman K.F. Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments//Psychological Assessment. 1995. V. 7. P. 286-299.             
  12. Goldberg L.R. An alternative "Description of personality": The Big-Five factor structure//Journ. of Personality and Social Psychology. 1990. V. 59. P. 1216-1229.
  13. Goldberg L.R. International Personality Items Pool, IPIP, 2001. URL: <http://ipip.ori.org/>
  14. Gow A.J., Whiteman M.C., Pattie A., Deary I.J. Goldberg's "IPIP" Big-Five factor markers: Internal consistency and concurrent validation in Scotland//Personality and Individual Differences. 2005. V. 39. P. 317-329.
  15. Halverson C.F., Havill V.L., Deal J. et. al. Personality structure as derived from parental ratings of free descriptions of children: The Inventory of Child Individual Differences//Journ. of Personality. 2003. V. 71. P. 995-1026.
  16. Knyazev G.G., Belopolsky V.I., Bodunov M.V., Wilson G.D. The factor structure of the Eysenck Personality Profiler in Russia//Personality and Individual Differences. 2004. V. 37. № 8. P. 1681-1692.        
  17. Knyazev G.G., Zupancic M., Slobodskaya H.R. Comparison of personality structure and mean level of traits in Slovenian and Russian children//Journ. of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2008. V. 39. P. 317-334.
  18. Lynn R., Martin T.A. Gender differences in Extraversion, Neuroticism, and Psychoticism in 37 Nations//Journ. of Social Psychology. 1997. V. 137. P. 369-373.
  19. Maccoby C.N., Jacklin E.E. The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1974.
  20. Martin T.A., Costa P.T., Oryol V.E., Rukavishnikov A.A., Senin I.G. Applications of the Russian NEO-PI-R//The Five-Factor Model Across Cultures/Eds. Marsella A.J. (Series Ed.), McCrae R.R., Allik J. N.Y.: Plenum, 2002. P. 261-277.
  21. McCrae R.R., Terracianno A. Universal features of personality traits from the observer's perspective: Data from 50 cultures//Journ. of Personality and Social Psychology. 2005. V. 88. P. 547-561.          
  22. McCrae R.R. Cross-cultural research on the Five-Factor Model of personality//Online readings in psychology and culture/Eds. W.J. Lonner, D.L. Dinnel, S.A. Hayes, D.N. Sattler. Bellingham, Washington, U.S.A.: Center for Cross-Cultural Research., 2004. URL: <http://www.wwu.edu/~culture>
  23. Mervielde I., Buyst V., De Fruyt F. The validity of the Big-Five as a model for teachers' ratings of individual differences among children aged 4-12 years//Personality and Individual Differences. 1995. V. 18. № 4. P. 525-534.
  24. Scholte R.H.J., De Bruyn E.E.J. Comparison of the Giant Three and the Big Five in early adolescents//Personality and Individual Differences. 2004. V. 36. № 6. P. 1353-1371.
  25. Sevasti V., Darviri S.V., Woods S. A. Uncertified absence from work and the Big Five: An examination of absence records and future absence intentions//Personality and Individual Differences. 2006. № 41. P. 359-369.
  26. Terracciano A., McCrae R.R., Brant L.J., Costa P.T.Jr. Hierarchical linear modeling analyses of the NEO-PI-R scales in the Baltimore longitudinal study of aging//Psychology and Aging. 2005. V. 20. P. 493-506.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate